Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

In the spirit of a related inquiry,related inquiry, I would like to know if there's a basis for understanding why there aren't any elementary particles that have non-zero electric charge but zero spin?

Can such a quantum theory be written down and self-consistent? Do the current symmetries of our present QFTs not allow such a particle?

In the spirit of a related inquiry, I would like to know if there's a basis for understanding why there aren't any elementary particles that have non-zero electric charge but zero spin?

Can such a quantum theory be written down and self-consistent? Do the current symmetries of our present QFTs not allow such a particle?

In the spirit of a related inquiry, I would like to know if there's a basis for understanding why there aren't any elementary particles that have non-zero electric charge but zero spin?

Can such a quantum theory be written down and self-consistent? Do the current symmetries of our present QFTs not allow such a particle?

Question Protected by Qmechanic
Added link to similar question. Also added a question about symmetries.
Source Link
BMS
  • 11.6k
  • 7
  • 47
  • 75

Is thereIn the spirit of a related inquiry, I would like to know if there's a basis for understanding why there aren't any elementary particles that have non-zero electric charge but zero spin?

Can such a quantum theory be written down and self-consistent? Do the current symmetries of our present QFTs not allow such a particle?

Is there a basis for understanding why there aren't any elementary particles that have non-zero electric charge but zero spin?

Can such a quantum theory be written down and self-consistent?

In the spirit of a related inquiry, I would like to know if there's a basis for understanding why there aren't any elementary particles that have non-zero electric charge but zero spin?

Can such a quantum theory be written down and self-consistent? Do the current symmetries of our present QFTs not allow such a particle?

Better wording imo.
Source Link
BMS
  • 11.6k
  • 7
  • 47
  • 75
Loading
Source Link
BMS
  • 11.6k
  • 7
  • 47
  • 75
Loading