Timeline for Asymmetry in magnetic field direction of an electric wire
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 31, 2015 at 9:47 | answer | added | knzhou | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 11, 2015 at 7:09 | comment | added | HolgerFiedler | @Asphir Dom I found an explanation and posted it here | |
Jan 11, 2015 at 2:01 | comment | added | Asphir Dom | Forget wire, use single electron moving in space. Do you think there is asymmetry in this case? | |
Aug 21, 2014 at 10:06 | answer | added | ProfRob | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 21, 2014 at 8:17 | history | edited | HolgerFiedler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Grammar
|
Aug 21, 2014 at 8:06 | comment | added | HolgerFiedler | A hand rule is always a asymmetry. Imagine you look on falling water from the high and you see the water is falling on a platform. And you discover that the water all is sliding from this platform to the right. You have to conclude that there is an asymmetry. And you are right. Climbing down you see that the platform is inclined to the right. | |
Aug 21, 2014 at 6:46 | comment | added | Ultima | Assuming you define current as the direction which positive charge moves, there is no assymetry. If your charge carriers are negatively charged, then you must use $I \to -I$. The magnetic field generated by this current still obeys the right hand rule, so there is no asymmetry. | |
Aug 21, 2014 at 6:37 | history | asked | HolgerFiedler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |