Timeline for Definition of force, kinetic energy and momentum
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2018 at 7:37 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 24, 2018 at 6:59 | answer | added | Intros Pector | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 5:33 | answer | added | littleO | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 26, 2014 at 22:41 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | A word on the place of "derivations" in physics: physics is not a branch of math and some things are accepted because that is the way thing are. We do derivations, because that is how we show that some allegedly fundamental inputs agree with observations and rules from a less fine-grained understanding; but the complex made up of the notion of energy, the work-energy theorem, the concept of momentum, the impulse-momentum theory, and the definitions of force and mass are in a real sense observationally founded. They can be checked for internal consistency, but they are what they are. | |
| May 26, 2014 at 21:25 | history | edited | user50224 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adding a new question, in order to make my "central" question clearer.
|
| May 26, 2014 at 19:40 | answer | added | Paride Azzari | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 26, 2014 at 18:53 | answer | added | user7154 | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 26, 2014 at 18:09 | answer | added | Alfred Centauri | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 26, 2014 at 16:32 | history | edited | user50224 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| May 26, 2014 at 16:25 | history | asked | user50224 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |