Skip to main content

Timeline for Why is the Hodge dual so essential?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 23, 2014 at 10:59 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/447689031808479232
Mar 23, 2014 at 1:43 comment added James S. Cook You might enjoy pages 136-138 of supermath.info/ma430.pdf there I investigate a toy 5-dimensional E and M where the difference between the electric and magnetic field are more pronounced.
Mar 23, 2014 at 0:00 vote accept ZachMcDargh
Mar 22, 2014 at 19:49 answer added Stan Liou timeline score: 15
Mar 22, 2014 at 18:28 comment added Martin Ueding I have a good picture of what $\vec B$ and $\vec E$ mean physically and what effect they have onto classical charged particles. I do not have a good picture of a two-form, yet. I'd like to, but I think I will have to wait until I did GR to get this.
S Mar 22, 2014 at 18:03 history suggested JamalS CC BY-SA 3.0
Improved LaTeX, added tag
Mar 22, 2014 at 18:01 review Suggested edits
S Mar 22, 2014 at 18:03
Mar 22, 2014 at 17:55 comment added ZachMcDargh @JamalS Yes, but treating the magnetic field as a vector is implicitly using its dual. I am looking for something that expresses Ampere's law treating $B$ as a 2-form.
Mar 22, 2014 at 17:48 comment added JamalS OP: "Do these laws have formulations that do not use Hodge duals?" - Have you checked Wikipedia? Gauss' laws and Ampere's laws may be written in terms of the $E$ and $B$ fields using vector calculus.
Mar 22, 2014 at 17:47 comment added ZachMcDargh I meant that tensors are less familiar than vectors, not differential forms. So people are more comfortable thinking of the magnetic field as its associated pseudo-vector than as an antisymmetric tensor.
Mar 22, 2014 at 17:46 history edited ZachMcDargh CC BY-SA 3.0
added 13 characters in body
Mar 22, 2014 at 17:36 history asked ZachMcDargh CC BY-SA 3.0