Skip to main content

There's more gravitational force in our galaxy (and others) than can be explained by counting stars made of ordinary matter. So why not lots of dark planeteryplanetary systems (iei.e., without stars) made of ordinary matter? Why must we assume some undiscovered and unexplained form of matter?

There's more gravitational force in our galaxy (and others) than can be explained by counting stars. So why not lots of dark planetery systems (ie without stars)? Why must we assume some undiscovered and unexplained form of matter?

There's more gravitational force in our galaxy (and others) than can be explained by counting stars made of ordinary matter. So why not lots of dark planetary systems (i.e., without stars) made of ordinary matter? Why must we assume some undiscovered and unexplained form of matter?

deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Why isn't dark matter just ordinary matter  ?

There's more gravitational force in our galaxy (and others) than can be explained by counting stars. So why not lots of dark planetery systems (ie without stars)  ? Why must we assume some undiscovered and unexplained form of matter  ?

Why isn't dark matter just matter  ?

There's more gravitational force in our galaxy (and others) than can be explained by counting stars. So why not lots of dark planetery systems (ie without stars)  ? Why must we assume some undiscovered and unexplained form of matter  ?

Why isn't dark matter just ordinary matter?

There's more gravitational force in our galaxy (and others) than can be explained by counting stars. So why not lots of dark planetery systems (ie without stars)? Why must we assume some undiscovered and unexplained form of matter?

edited tags
Link
David Z
  • 77.3k
  • 27
  • 186
  • 293
Source Link
Loading