The more common names for what you are talking about are the abbreviated action
$$S_0[q] := \int p \mathrm{d}q$$
versus the action
$$ S[q] := \int_{t_1}^{t_2}L(q,\dot q,t)\mathrm{d}t$$
Both are used in different formulations of classical mechanics, and deliver a different "flavor" of solutions. On both one can do variations calculus and obtains the classical trajectory $q_{cl}$ as the extremum of the action.
The abbreviated action obeys Maupertuis' principle and gives you the classical path provided you know the conserved energy along the trajectory and the start- and endpoints.
The action's extrema are found by the usual Euler-Lagrange equations and gives you the classical path provided you know the start- and endtimes as well as points.
Now, what has the abbreviated action to do with $L + H$? Observe that
$$\int p \mathrm{d}q =\int p \dot q \mathrm{d}t = \int (L + H) \mathrm{d}t$$
since $L$ and $H$ are Legrendre transforms w.r.t. $\dot q$ resp. $p$ of each other.