Skip to main content
Ali's user avatar
Ali's user avatar
Ali's user avatar
Ali
  • Member for 4 years, 1 month
  • Last seen more than 3 years ago
  • Australia
comment
Explaining rotation without mathematics
Either way speed of sound or speed of light. It takes time for things to take effect.
revised
Explaining rotation without mathematics
added 262 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
answered
Loading…
comment
Einstein's Derivation of Lorentz transformations
So my reasoning is the following. A light beam travels a distance x in one frame, this is an event that occurs in space-time. The equation in one frame is x-ct=0. In the other frame x'-ct'=0. The only way the same event can satisfy these two equation is when (x-ct)=k(x'-ct'). This is because at t=t'=0, and x=x'=0 (when the light beam is emitted) is also an event that has to satisfy the relationship. So the disappearance of the x-ct coincides with the disappearance of x'-ct'. The two systems are coupled.
awarded
awarded
revised
Simplification using Newton's second law
added 3 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Einstein's Derivation of Lorentz transformations
I recall in Einsteins original 1905 paper on special relativity, he derived things a bit differently. To be honest, his derivations were a bit confusing and they require a lot of thinking to understand. There are much more easier methods that you can use to build the Lorentz Transformations. (e.g. Griffiths Intro to Electrodynamics has a good derivation of the transformations).
comment
Einstein's Derivation of Lorentz transformations
I did some research and I found this. Is this what you are refering to?en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
comment
Einstein's Derivation of Lorentz transformations
If you could please refer me to the paper, I may be able to assist you further.
Loading…
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…