Skip to main content
Agerhell's user avatar
Agerhell's user avatar
Agerhell's user avatar
Agerhell
  • Member for 5 years, 8 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
Stats
739
reputation
45k
reached
41
answers
10
questions
Loading…
About

I have a really old project of mine dealing with relativistic celestial mechanics. Questions I ask on this site might be related to that. An old paper on that subject matter, which is a bit messy, is available here. In that paper I use the expression:

enter image description here

to simulate orbits. At least I get the Schwarzschild radius right as seen here The innermost stable circular orbit is actually a bit off even if it look ok when you start the simulation from the aphelion of a not too eliptical orbit. You get the expression by plugging:

mass variation

into:

basic assumption.

I currently believe that you might get results somewhat more in line with what is expected from the Schwarzschild solution if you use the gamma shown below, but I have not checked it out yet:

enter image description here

Using this "new gammafunction" for pure non-radial motion you get the same expression as the first above. For pure radial motion you instead get:

Acceleration new gamma pure radial motion

We can make a superposition of these two solutions that looks like:

Attempt at general acceleration using anisotropic c

I do not know if this expression has any clear benefit, but it least it is based on using an anisotropic velocity of light, just as in GR. I might add some more info on my blog.

This user doesn’t have any gold badges yet.
4
silver badges
22
bronze badges
18
Score
34
Posts
67
Posts %
16
Score
18
Posts
35
Posts %
12
Score
23
Posts
45
Posts %
12
Score
19
Posts
37
Posts %
7
Score
6
Posts
12
Posts %
3
Score
8
Posts
16
Posts %
Top posts
View all questions and answers