1
vote
Why can the Ampere not be defined as the flow of $n$ Coulomb in $n$ seconds?
Mathematically , both are Equivalent. Practically , we might have Difficulties.
There at least 3 Issues or flaws with your way.
(1) When we say "n" , we are leaving it unknown.
When I report ...
1
vote
Accepted
Why can the Ampere not be defined as the flow of $n$ Coulomb in $n$ seconds?
That’s how it is defined, using the 1’s rather than the n’s.
You’re not really missing anything about the math/physics of the situation. Yes your definition would indeed give the same result. It’s ...
1
vote
Dimensional Analysis in Electromagnetism (SI vs Gaussian-cgs)
Here's the conversion. I will write Gaussian quantities as
$$\hat{φ}, 𝐚, 𝐛, 𝐞, 𝐝, 𝐡, 𝐣, \hat{ρ}, q, \hat{ε}, \hat{μ}$$
and the corresponding SI quantities as
$$φ, 𝐀, 𝐁, 𝐄, 𝐃, 𝐇, 𝐉, ρ, e, ε,...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
si-units × 589units × 293
metrology × 189
dimensional-analysis × 173
conventions × 72
electromagnetism × 48
mass × 44
physical-constants × 38
homework-and-exercises × 31
charge × 31
definition × 31
energy × 29
time × 27
temperature × 26
newtonian-mechanics × 25
thermodynamics × 24
notation × 24
measurements × 24
absolute-units × 22
electrostatics × 21
speed-of-light × 21
history × 20
electric-current × 18
forces × 15
quantum-mechanics × 14