Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with scattering
Search options not deleted
user 87665
Scattering is a general term for several physical processes in which radiation of some sort changes direction due to an interaction with a particle. Scattering can be classified by the type of radiation (ie, electromagnetic, x-ray, neutron), or by the relative sizes of the wave and the particle (ie, Rayleigh, Mie, geometric).
0
votes
1
answer
182
views
Non-square transfer matrix from square scattering matrix
(Image borrowed from http://www.fiberstore.com/images/ckfinder/images/tutorial/1x2_Splitter.jpg)
Currently, I have the entire scattering matrix for my device:
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
A_\text{in}^{(-)}\\ … It seems that generating a transfer-matrix for such a splitter should be quite straightforward, especially since I already have the scattering matrix data. Am I missing something here? …
CommunityBot
- 1
0
votes
Non-square transfer matrix from square scattering matrix
However, for my purposes I can just write out the separate equations resulting from the 3x3 scattering matrices and solve the system brute-force. … TLDR; don't need the transfer matrices, scattering matrices do just fine on their own. …
