Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with elementary-particles
Search options not deleted
user 37035
The fundamental subatomic particles that have no (currently known) substructure. These include fermions (quarks, leptons, antiquarks, and antileptons) and bosons (gauge bosons and the Higgs boson). A particle containing two or more elementary particles is a composite particle.
5
votes
2
answers
722
views
Is an elementary particle traveling through a vacuum the *same* particle at points A and B?
This is a question I've wondered about for a long time.
Imagine an elementary particle moving through a vacuum. Take any two arbitrary points along its path; we'll call them points A and B. Is the pa …
- 1,331