Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Bell's inequality is a no-go theorem contrasting crucial correlations of physical observables in QM to those of the world as described by classical mechanics, essentially local hidden variables theories serving as a viable "explanation" of QM: QM inevitably violates these inequalities, as observed. Further use for the CHSH inequality generalization.
1
vote
1
answer
73
views
Understanding operator product of three mixed states with three projector operators
I am recently studying the triangle scenario in the context of Bell nonlocality (for reference, see for instance this article). In it, we have three parties, commonly referred to as Alice, Bob and Cha …