Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with observers
Search options not deleted
user 359498
For questions related to observers in relativity or quantum mechanics.
-7
votes
1
answer
101
views
Is time dilation real or only imagination of the observers? [closed]
As long as the time dilation is about what the observers think or see, there would be no great difficulty. But the assertions that the clocks run faster or slower cannot be justified. …
- 14
-1
votes
Confusing definition of proper time – which is correct?
One has to imagine 2 systems K and K' with relative velocity "v", and 2 observers A in K, and observer B in K'. The time they both measure with their clocks is the same. …
- 14
0
votes
Is time dilation derivable from (non-)simultaneity?
We have to declare what stands for what. In equations, x' is the distance from the origin of the moving frame. Normally the observer assumes it to be stationary, so x' could be named as the proper val …
- 14
0
votes
Deriving time dilation from a moving photon clock
Lorentz Factor was long before using it by Einstein there for other proposes.
there are 2 questionable approaches to deriving Lorentz transformation from 1905 and 1916 by Einstein
following I'd show a …
- 14