Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 35354

The theoretical symmetry of physical laws under the transformation of time reversal, that is t -> -t.

5 votes

Does Energy change sign when time is reversed?

As John Rennie wrote in his answer, what one should consider is not a generic $\Delta t$ but the period $\tau$ which is a positive number. However positivity also arises form coherence with other rela …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
2 votes

How to apply anti-unitary symmetry operators?

You forgot the crucial fact that the observables are selfadjoint and that the relevant matrix elements have the same entries. Only those matrix elements are physically measurable since they are expec …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Is time reversal operator not a representation of Lorentz group?

The point is that the symmetries in QM (bijective operations sending states to states preserving the transition probability) can be represented by either unitary or antiunitary operators. This is the …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Time reversal of scalar Bloch states

Notice that the vectors $k$ belong to the reciprocal lattice and the label $k$ is by definition ambiguous: if you change $k$ by adding a generator of the reciprocal lattice, the wave function changes …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

How to check if a Hamiltonian is PT symmetric or not?

There is a mistake in your definition of time reversal as $x$ is fixed under that transformation, the remaining transformations being correct. With this correct version of T, the Hamiltonian you study …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
4 votes

Can we regard a spin-1 particle as combination of two spin-1/2 particles?

(I am not sure to understand what the question is actually.) Yes it is possible, if ignoring the orbital part of the state describing the relative position of the two fermions (or the relative momen …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
2 votes

Why do we need an explanation for the arrow of time?

We would like to understand whether or not the time arrow is consequence of fundamental laws or, better, of the initial conditions of the evolution of a single system or the entire universe. It is qui …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Time Reversal Operator and Rotations

I am not sure to understand the question. Are you asking why exponent do not change as a consequence of $\Theta S_k \Theta^{-1} = -S_k$? You are forgetting that $\Theta$ is anti linear, so $$\Theta …
Valter Moretti's user avatar
10 votes

Why is time-reversal represented by an antilinear and antiunitary operator?

The statement is true if the Hamiltonian operator has spectrum bounded below ( due to thermodynamical reasons) but not above as it happens in many relevant physical systems. Here is the proof. The ti …
Valter Moretti's user avatar