Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with electrostatics
Search options not deleted
user 306737
Electrostatics is concerned with the electrical fields and scalar potentials of stationary electrical charges and charge distributions. Use this for questions about electromagnetic situations in which currents and magnetic fields are absent, otherwise use the [electromagnetism] and/or [magnetic-fields] tags.
0
votes
Gauss law at the surface of a conductor
I think I understand it. Reason my calculation is wrong is not the train of thought but the the last calculation step which is considering the E field of the charges inside the gauss surface. for a ch …
- 27
0
votes
2
answers
310
views
Gauss law at the surface of a conductor
I came up with a conclusion where I find half of the result on the picture.
Here is how can the half of the result:
I thought the same gaussian surface. But since we know that, charges outside the g …
- 27