Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with kinematics
Search options not deleted
user 300280
The description of the movement of bodies by their position, velocity, acceleration (and possibly higher time derivatives, such as, jerk) without concern for the underlying dynamics/forces/causes.
3
votes
1
answer
67
views
What was the professor talking about regarding constraint forces? [closed]
I am taking a mechanics class at university. Last week we started describing movement over a curve; we are given a natural parametrisation $s(t)$, and then we have the following relations:
$$ \vec{r}( …
- 179
0
votes
0
answers
30
views
What was the professor counting regarding constraint forces? [duplicate]
I am taking a mechanics class at university. Last week we started describing movement over a curve; we are given a natural parametrisation $s(t)$, and then we have the following relations:
$$ \vec{r}( …
- 179