Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 133418

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework describing the quantisation of classical fields which allows a Lorentz-invariant formulation of quantum mechanics. QFT is used both in high energy physics as well as condensed matter physics and closely related to statistical field theory. Use this tag for many-body quantum-mechanical problems and the theory of particle physics. Don’t combine with the [quantum-mechanics] tag.

2 votes
Accepted

Free Feynman propagator calculation

Combine the two fractions in the first equation to get: \begin{equation} \frac{2E_p - 2i\epsilon}{(p^0)^2 - (E_p - i \epsilon)^2} \end{equation} Yes, you then ignore the $\epsilon^2$ term in the deno …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
0 votes

Why field redefinitions that leave Lagrangians unchanged are allowed?

The quantum field $\phi$ is not a measurable quantity. It's a crutch you use to calculate physical observables like cross sections. So there's nothing that prevents you from redefining your field, as …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
3 votes
Accepted

Bhabha scattering Energy conservation

(2nd diagram) Since the photon is virtual, its exchange is the process that happens during interaction, neither before nor after. Now, energy and 3-momentum is conserved at each vertex. Also keep in …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
2 votes

What would a Lagrangian without a kinetic term represent?

There is no dynamical content without kinetic terms, and in fact it makes the theory sick. Suppose you have $$\mathcal L = \frac{X}{2}(\partial \phi)^2 -\frac{m^2}{2} \phi^2 -\frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
1 vote
Accepted

Electron and positron pair production and annihilation

A lone photon will never decay into an electron-positron pair. This process is kinematically not allowed because of 3-momentum conservation. You need a nucleus nearby for the process to materialize. …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
2 votes

Is the physics of a Quantum Field Theory dependent on the choice of Lagrangian?

As a corollary, two Lagrangians that look vastly different from each other, producing vastly different classical equations of motion, can actually describe the same physics, if the fields in the two L …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
3 votes

What does it mean for the Hamiltonian to not be bounded from below?

Hamiltonians that are unbounded from below lead to instabilities of the physical system in question. Mathematically, it just simply means that the Hamiltonian (or crudely, energy) can take arbitrarily …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
1 vote

Proof of overall momentum conservation

The number of 4-momentum conserving delta functions is one more than the number of (independent) internal momenta. After performing integrations over the internal momenta, you will be left with one re …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
1 vote

Lagrangian with quadratic interaction

There is no absolute rule to be followed in order to determine if something is an "interaction" or not. You can interpret it in different ways, do field redefinitions, etc. At the end of the day, if y …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
1 vote

How should I think about the word "coupling" in quantum field theory?

Is the fact that something is coupled to something else mathematically well-defined? Sort of, because when you say that X and Y are coupled to each other, it means that X and Y interact with each ot …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
1 vote
Accepted

QFT in A Nutshell Zee I.3.1

The 2003 edition of the book has a typo. In rightmost expression, the correct limits are $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}$, not $\int_{0}^{\infty}$. The second part of \begin{equation} \int_0^\infty \frac{dk …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
1 vote

How do you derive a quantum field theory from a spacetime metric?

The standard (QFT) way of quantizing gravity is by applying what is known as the background field method. Here, you write the metric tensor $g_{\mu \nu}$ as a sum of some classical background spacetim …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
0 votes

Why energy-positivity?

You are right: in a theory which describes a system not interacting with others, it does not matter if the energy is unbounded from below. However, that is a boring universe with no dynamics or intera …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
10 votes

How does the absence of quadratic terms in the Lagrangian imply massless quanta?

I will expand a bit on one of the answers to be clearer why a quadratic term usually leads to the 'mass' term. Because the coefficient in front of the $A_\mu A^\mu$ term has dimension $2$ doesn't by i …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912
15 votes
Accepted

How can the graviton be both massless and self-interacting?

Gravitons couple to energy-momentum tensor $T_{\mu \nu}$, not mass (which captures only the $00$ component of $T_{\mu \nu}$). That's why photons (which are also massless, like gravitons) interact with …
Avantgarde's user avatar
  • 3,912

15 30 50 per page