*Short version*: If voltage is defined for conservative vector field $\vec{E}$ only, at what point in a changing electric field does voltage become undefined?

*Long Version*:
Voltage is typically defined as the change in potential energy between two points in an electrostatic field. 
$$ V = -\int_C \vec{E}\ \circ d\vec{l}$$
This brings about the question of the existence of a function $\phi$ such that $\nabla \phi = \vec{E} $, and in order for this to be true, we require that:
$$ \frac{\partial E_x}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial E_y}{\partial x} $$
$$ \frac{\partial E_x}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial E_z}{\partial x} $$
$$ \frac{\partial E_y}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial E_z}{\partial y} $$
In addition to this requirement, we see that:
$$ \nabla \times \vec{E} = \vec0 $$
$$ \oint_C \vec{E} = 0 $$
However, these requirements are broken if $\vec{E}$ is changing, as $\vec{E}$ is no longer static, and an associated magnetic field affects the electric field by supplying a curl component. 

I am an electrical engineer, and I've studied a fair amount of microwave engineering enough to know that waveguides which support TE and TM modes of electromagnetic wave transmission have 'voltages' and 'currents' which are defined in a different way from those we use in circuit theory. However, we continue to use voltage and current with TEM waves, low frequency design, and RF design. These voltages cannot be a potential function of $\vec E$, so the natural question is, how are they defined?

A simple resolution is that they are defined for quasi-static fields, i.e. the fields change slowly so we have no issue. Another resolution is a different definition of voltage. 

My question is, at what point (in terms of amplitude, frequency, slew rate) in circuit theory does $\nabla V \neq \vec{E}$ become a problem for calculations involving voltage defined by potential energy in an electrostatic field?