Skip to main content
2 of 3
added 58 characters in body
Aman pawar
  • 368
  • 1
  • 10

I had the same question about a month ago when i tried to interprete the mathematics of electroweak SSB(sponteneous symmetry breaking). I investigated the obvious resolutions: either [1]maths is givining wrong interpretations or [2]It is giving correct interpretations.

Since Standard Model of EW interaction is so profound, I assumed [2] is coorrect.

So, what is the interpretation then if we analyze the math?

Consider this (understand in terms of fields, which are more fundamental than particles):

[a]Before SSB, above electroweak unification energy($E_{ew}$), we had 4 fields.

[b]At $E_{ew}$, these 4 fields starts interacting with each other and mixes in different combinations.

[c]After SSB, we have 4 new fields.

{$E_{ew}$ is about 246 GeV(approximately $10^{15}$ K, a temperature exceeded until shortly after the Big Bang)}

i.e., the real world is energy dependent. The cases [a], [b] and [c] do not exist together. The fields in [c] are completely new and its like resultant fields of combinations. And Our current stage of the universe falls under [c], therefore only [c] fields exist.

"what happens to W1, W2, W3 and B?" These fields do not exists in this stage of the universe.

"does that mean the W3 and B bosons are created for an instant and then mix to form a photon in the heart of a star?"

No!. Only photons are created directly. The reason is that W3 and B fileds do not exists in this stage and therefore we can't have W3 and B quanta. Only A and Z fields exists.

Aman pawar
  • 368
  • 1
  • 10