If energy is equivalent to the work done on a motor and the work done on the motor is multiplied by more than 100% by reusing the same energy, then why would we say that you can't get more than 100% energy out of a system?

The conservation of energy law prevents a closed loop system from ever achieving more than 100% energy.

For instance if a motor is powered from a capacitor with 1 joule of energy in it then the motor has done 1 joule's worth of work or has done 1 watt's worth of work within 1 second of time. The very definition of a joule is a one watt second, or more like the potential to do the work of one watt within one second.

Please bear with me here.

If all 100% of the energy in the capacitor is transferred out and into the motor then the motor has done 100% work. A simple meter can be used to confirm this simple fact.  

If this is done just one time and the motor drains the capacitor completely down until the motor stops then all 100% of the energy in the capacitor has been transferred into the motor, and so the motor has done 100% of the work less a few losses due to resistance, all normal so far I hope.

This is where my question begins in the form of a secondary question. If we reuse or recycle the energy repeatedly, which is most definitely possible, and store it yet in another capacitor we can do more work than what was originally possible compared to using the energy only once and not recycling it.

If energy is equivalent to the work done on the motor and the work done on the motor is multiplied by more than 100%  then why would we say that you can't get more than 100% energy out of a system?