Skip to main content
4 of 8
deleted 24 characters in body
kjo
  • 177
  • 6

Experimental confirmation of the textbook explanation for local entropy reductions

Textbook discussions of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (SLT) often stress that this law applies only to "closed systems". Or, differently stated: if the system is not closed, its entropy can go down.

The argument is further refined as follows. Suppose that $B$ is a closed system, and that $A$ and $A^{'}$ are "disjoint" subsystems of $B$ such that $B = A + A^{'}$. Then, by SLT,

$$\Delta S_B = \Delta S_A + \Delta S_{A^{'}} > 0\label{a}\tag{1}$$

...but this does not rule out cases where

$$\Delta S_A < 0\label{b}\tag{2}.$$

In such case $\Delta S_{A^{'}}$ would be positive and such that $|\Delta S_{A^{'}}| > |\Delta S_A|$. thereby preserving $(\ref{a})$.


My question is: How is this particular aspect of the theory verified experimentally?

IOW, is it possible to set up an actual (as opposed to "Gedanken-") experiment where all three quantities in $(\ref{a})$ are measured, and such that, with the measured values, both $(\ref{a})$ and $(\ref{b})$ hold?

Or is the argument given above simply a purely theoretical (i.e. experimentally unverifiable) construct to explain why apparent reductions in entropy1 are not necessarily violations of SLT?


1 ...such as in the formation of ordered crystals from a disordered collection of molecules in solution.

kjo
  • 177
  • 6