Questions tagged [theory-of-everything]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0
votes
0answers
65 views

What would be the mathematical features of a theory of everything?

GR and QFT are both axiomatic systems, right? If their axioms are logically independent, and a number of them are absolutely true in describing the universe, i.e. non-removable from a TOE, is there ...
0
votes
1answer
116 views

Biggest string theory competitors [closed]

i am a layman in physics and i just want to know what are, as of today, the most importants framework for quantum gravity that contrast string theory and why is so?
-4
votes
1answer
80 views

Brute-forcing the theory of everything [closed]

If brute force doesn't work, you're probably just not using enough of it. That's especially true for guessing combinations of stuff, like characters in a password. Assuming some combination of ...
-1
votes
1answer
76 views

Gödel undecidability in physics [duplicate]

According to Gödel's Incompleteness theorems, there exist problems in any sufficiently powerful, consistent system of arithmetic that are undecidable form the axioms of said system. *What known ...
3
votes
1answer
233 views

How does physics research work? [closed]

I am going to try and be as short and as concise as possible. I was thinking these last few days about how we're still trying to discover a unified Theory of Everything. The question is: how is this ...
1
vote
2answers
92 views

What is the motivation for developing a “theory of everything”?

What is the reason physicists are working so hard looking for a "theory of everything" and trying to unify gravity with quantum mechanics? Historically, new theories were always developed to explain ...
6
votes
3answers
282 views

Does string theory accommodate effects of dark energy?

String theory is arguably, among best candidates for a Theory of Everything. So, because every TOE is an attempt to bind together the big and very small effects and things, a TOE must be able to ...
0
votes
2answers
157 views

Is $E_8$ theory any close to reality by any means? [closed]

The E8 theory from Wikipedia: "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" is a physics preprint proposing a basis for a unified field theory, often referred to as "E8 Theory", which attempts to ...
0
votes
1answer
167 views

Why Einstein's unified field theory is believed not to work?

In his later life, Albert Einstein was trying to extend his general theory of relativity to incorporate electromagnetism and other fundamental forces with it, something he himself called "The theory ...
3
votes
1answer
174 views

Why are we trying to fit GR in QFT when there's a chance that GR is incomplete?

GR explains most phenomena in our universe, but not everything.. Dark matter and Dark energy still don't fit in explanation of GR. QFT, on other hand, is almost complete. Shouldn't physicists go for ...
0
votes
1answer
73 views

Emergent physics in the gap between the Planck scale and the “size” of quarks [closed]

The smallest probed length scale to date is around $\Delta x \approx 10^{-18} m$ (see here). If we compare this to the Planck scale of $\Delta x \approx 10^{-35} m$ we are left with almost 20 orders ...
1
vote
0answers
34 views

Running of gravitational constant versus. other coupling constants, GUT and TOE

Is there any theory that proves convincingly that the gravitational constant runs with energy AND it is like the other coupling constants and converge at a single point at a given energy? Or is that a ...
-1
votes
1answer
59 views

Field theory if no fundamental space-time [closed]

If there is no fundamental space-time, is the field concept also doomed? If so, how can we derive unified field theory in a background space-time if there is no background space-time or worst, no ...
11
votes
1answer
224 views

String theory and one idea of “quantum structure of spacetime”

First of all, I do recognize that I haven't studied string theory up to this point. I'm actualy just getting started with it. So my question here is as follows: Einstein's theory of General ...
0
votes
0answers
92 views

Could the graviton be more than one particle?

I guess this amounts to saying that gravity isn't a fundamental force and is, in fact, an emergent phenomenon (as in Erik Verlinde's theory). If gravity can be 'unified' with the other forces surely ...
12
votes
3answers
5k views

Are we closer to a theory of everything thanks to the detection of gravitational waves?

A couple of weeks ago I heard an astronomer explain that one of the latest detections of gravitational waves was accompanied by simultaneous detections of the same astronomical event in various other ...
-2
votes
2answers
109 views

Is there a mathmatical theory to explain all physical phenomena? [duplicate]

Does anybody know of any physicists or mathematicians who have put forward a theory to everything, for which this mathematical theory would explain all physical phenomena in the universe in one ...
0
votes
2answers
219 views

Why in physics does one ask increasingly fundamental questions of matter? [closed]

Many physicists seek to understand grand theories of everything by reduction to smaller components or building blocks. Those trained, but maybe are not practicing talk about the importance of "first ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

Why is there isn't a Theory of everything after decades of research? [duplicate]

Why isnt there a theory of everything after decades of research by the best minds of the world. Is it because that general relativity and quantum mechanics are so different in their ideals
-4
votes
1answer
140 views

Is String Theory the end of (currently known) physics? [closed]

Assuming that String Theory were true, does it explain all the currently known physics? Or are there anything that is known to exist and that even String Theory would not be able to explain?
-1
votes
1answer
93 views

Who are the present 'superstars' pursuing significant breakthroughs toward a Theory of Everything (TOE)? [closed]

What are the main problems remaining to create a Theory of Everything (TOE) and who are some of the main contemporaries pursuing the TOE?
7
votes
2answers
1k views

What does it mean that space-time is emergent?

Edward Witten (Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton), Fields medaillist, the discoverer of M-theory and considered a genius by many, recently gave one of his rare interviews (https://www....
2
votes
1answer
206 views

Are certain fields of physics axiomatized?

Everything from Quantum mechanics can be derived from six (?) postulates. Similarly classical electrodynamics can be reduced to Maxwell's equations and Lorentz force law, and special relativity is ...
0
votes
2answers
155 views

Quantum mechanics interpretations [closed]

Let's assume that the existance of the graviton is proved theoretically or it is detected by the LHC and there is found a way for Pilot Wave Theory for it to account to special relativity via the ...
1
vote
1answer
118 views

Theory of Everything and the initial conditions

From what I've understood, the basic motivation behind the idea of "the Theory of Everything" (its modern attempt being M theory) is to find a simple rule which unifies all phenomena observed in ...
6
votes
3answers
418 views

Why to unify gravity with the other forces if gravity isn't really a force?

As I understand, the Theory of General Relativity says that the force of gravity doesn't exist. The planets move in elliptical orbits because the spacetime is curved by the mass of the sun, not ...
-2
votes
3answers
163 views

Exact precise logical axiomatization of Physics [closed]

I know this question had been asked many times before but maybe not in this form. So I really need the exact axiomatization of Physics. I have been looking for it for a long time. Precise logical ...
8
votes
3answers
462 views

Why is general relativity background independent and electromagnetism is background dependent?

I read in a book, it is hard to formulate the theory of everything by unifying all the forces, because general relativity is a background independent theory while electromagnetism isn't. Why is this ...
1
vote
0answers
47 views

What is the minimum set of hypotheses which the present physics is based on? [duplicate]

Based on nowadays human understanding, what are the most fundamental hypotheses or principles in present physics which could deduce all other formula/theorem/details/applications?
1
vote
2answers
112 views

If an electron turns into a black hole, does it retain its charge?

If an electron becomes a black hole, does it retain its charge? Or does it lose it? What if a proton becomes a black hole?
5
votes
4answers
207 views

Reformulating QFT to exclude space-time basis

This is, I guess, a pretty loose or general question and so I hope it's ok to post in this forum. But I suppose this is what science is all about: asking and seeing what happens. It is just personal ...
1
vote
2answers
210 views

Can there be really a theory of everything? [closed]

If quantum theory becomes compatible with Einstein's theory of gravity, we get the theory of everything. But if it can predict anything in the universe (provided boundary equations are given) wouldn't ...
1
vote
1answer
57 views

Is it possible that the universe is (logically) classical (as opposed to, say, intuitionistic or minimal) within certain limits, but not generally?

This question is one that has been bothering me for some time now. We have assumed, based on our observations, that the universe is subservient to the principles of classical logic. But is it ...
9
votes
2answers
898 views

Is the Lagrangian approach essentially a 'theory of everything'?

From learning about the Lagrangian lately it seems that that it can underlie so many phenomena that it must be the unifying concept that underpins all physics. I often hear that physicists are ...
3
votes
3answers
537 views

Why doesn't renormalization with a Planck-scale cutoff work for quantum gravity?

It's well known that general relativity and quantum theory break down at the Planck distance. What I don't understand is why you can't use the Planck distance as a sort of cutoff. As I understand it ...
1
vote
0answers
153 views

A brief description of a plausible and possible candidate for Quantum Gravity [closed]

I wanted to know the specifics(essence) of a particular theory that is present for quantum gravity (QG),and which seems to have the best potential. I am no expert on field theories and QG, cause ...
3
votes
0answers
98 views

Does Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis require instantiation/substrate/implementation? [closed]

Max Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis appears to be a "radical Platonist" theory, arguing that mathematical structures form the basis of the universe/reality. One thing that's not clear to ...
5
votes
6answers
1k views

Why string theory?

I am new to String Theory. I've read that String theory is an important theory because it is a good candidate for a unified theory of all forces. It is "better" than the Standard Model of particle ...
0
votes
1answer
103 views

Will Gödel's theorem strike a death blow to the future of science? [duplicate]

According to Gödel's incompleteness theorem, no matter how many statements you prove, you will always have a set of statements not proved. Does this imply that some time in the future, scientific ...
6
votes
4answers
967 views

Physics after a Theory of Everything [closed]

There is a lot of controversy over the existence of a Theory of Everything (ToE), and as far as I know, we are a long way from having a possible candidate. But what interests me is, what after that? ...
1
vote
0answers
86 views

Experiments to resolve dillema between continuity and discrete

Which experiments/experimental methods are suggested to resolve an alternative about the structure of our universe space and time - is it continuous or is it discrete in a very small scale, especially ...
-2
votes
1answer
75 views

Fundamentals for predicting the standard model? [closed]

. Now, the question(s). What must a theory include to be consistent with the standard model? What concepts/ fields must be predicted?(such as predicting a Higgs field, gauge groups, particles being ...
2
votes
0answers
93 views

Is there any additional complexity in the physical laws that seems unnecessary for us to exist? [closed]

I am wondering if the universe is as simple as possible, at least given the constraint that humans exist on Earth. This is my second attempt at this question, which was marked as too broad, since I ...
4
votes
3answers
196 views

Are field theories special?

Our best descriptions of the microscopic world, that satisfy many fundamental requirements (as we know them today), are field theories. Is there something fundamental about field interactions, or are ...
2
votes
3answers
397 views

Is Bekenstein entropy limit inconsistent with universal continuity?

It is unknown whether the universe is discrete or continuous in its intricate quantum level structure. See for example: Can universal continuity be experimentally falsified? Is the universe finite ...
3
votes
1answer
156 views

Would a Theory of Everything allow us to calculate the constants of physics?

I have heard several times in the past that a Theory of Everything would allow us to calculate (as opposed to measure) the fundamental dimensionless physical constants. What I mean is, e.g., the fine ...
-3
votes
2answers
527 views

The Simulation Hypothesis As A Theory Of Everything [closed]

I have long found the Simulation Hypothesis to be better-able to answer questions that I have regarding the universe than the string theory and the quantum field theory. What I believe is that the ...
5
votes
2answers
228 views

What is it exactly that conflicts when trying to unify all 4 fundamental forces? [duplicate]

Everyone knows that there are 4 fundamental forces: Gravity Electromagnetic Weak Strong At school and university you're taught that no one has been able to unify these 4 fources. However, not a ...
4
votes
3answers
2k views

What are the technical obstructions that prevent scale relativity from being a viable theory of quantum-gravity? [closed]

This post has been imported on physicsoverflow, see here. The astrophysicist Laurent Nottale develops since 1984 the scale relativity, which aims to unify quantum physics and relativity theory, using ...
2
votes
2answers
195 views

What is high energy physics?

Is high energy physics the same as particle physics? Does research in high-energy physics include things like quantum gravity, string theory and quantum field theory? Is unifying the four ...