Questions tagged [point-particles]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5
votes
2answers
194 views

Why does it make sense to talk about the first-quantized BRST formulation of a relativistic point particle?

My question is about the BRST quantization of a point particle in Polchinski, Vol.1, Section 4.2. The BRST quantization starts from the effective action for the gauge-fixed path-integral. But for the ...
2
votes
0answers
33 views

Is there a code for Ewald Summation for Dipoles?

Does anybody know if there exists a code that calculates the potential energy for a system with both point charges and point dipoles using Ewald summation? This would be a great help to my Master ...
14
votes
6answers
2k views

Can elementary particles be explained adequately by a wave-only model?

I have been watching quantum mechanics documentaries and reading a layman's book called "The Quantum Universe". I believe I understand why the double slit experiments exclude a particle only model. ...
4
votes
1answer
37 views

Action for extended objects

Take a spacetime $M$, with some $k$-manifold embedding $$X : \Sigma \to M$$ The image of $X$ represents some extended object (a $k$-brane as the string theory people say). If we only care about the ...
2
votes
1answer
129 views

Deriving the 4-momentum of a free particle moving in curved spacetime

Consider a free particle with rest mass $m$ moving along a geodesic in some curved spacetime with metric $g_{\mu\nu}$: $$S=-m\int d\tau=-m\int\Big(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\Big)d\lambda=\int L\ d\lambda\...
0
votes
1answer
41 views

Is this a sufficient condition for a stable equilibrium point?

My question is based on thinking about a point particle in electromagnetic fields, but the idea should apply to other problems. The point $\mathbf x_0$ is an equilibrium point of the force field $\...
0
votes
2answers
78 views

Relative size of electrons and quarks

Today, we consider quarks and electrons (leptons) as point-like or fundamental (structureless). Is there any way to indirectly probe quark/lepton substructure and guess if they are composite of ...
0
votes
1answer
67 views

In QED why is the electron a point particle? [duplicate]

I read Feynman's book but this still unclear to me.
0
votes
1answer
91 views

Does the electron have size? [duplicate]

Can we ascertain the size of the electron? If it really is zero radius, then it can't be matter because it doesn't occupy space? Definition of matter (Google): physical substance in general, as ...
30
votes
4answers
6k views

Is there anything in the universe that cannot be compressed?

I've always thought that there is nothing in the universe that cannot be compressed or deformed under enough force but my friend insists that elementary particles are exempt from this. My thought is ...
1
vote
1answer
138 views

How to theoretically/experimentally prove that spin can not be treated as a classical (rotational) motion? [closed]

As well known, spin could not be thought of as a rotational motion in classical mechanics, i.e. it's an intrinsic property. But how to prove it? i.e. how to mathematically/experimentally show that ...
14
votes
5answers
2k views

What are some useful ways to imagine the concept of spin as it relates to subatomic particles?

The answers in this question: What is spin as it relates to subatomic particles? do not address some particular questions regarding the concept of spin: How are some useful ways to imagine a ...
0
votes
1answer
47 views

Why the continuous arrangement of point masses (particles) at infinitesimal separations leads to a extended system?

I am basically talking in terms of Newtonian mechanics. The Newton's laws started with a good and easy assumption of particles as point masses. This assumption clearly reformed physics and a great ...
4
votes
1answer
227 views

Non-relativistic limit of Hamiltonian for a free particle in general relativity

The Hamiltonian for a particle moving in a gravitational field can be taken as $$\mathcal{H} = \frac12 \sum_{\mu,\nu=0}^3g^{\mu\nu}(x)p_\mu p_\nu\tag{1}$$ as long as the parametrization is affine. ...
0
votes
0answers
30 views

Point particle and angular deficit

I would like to understand in what sense an angular deficit can be interpreted as a point particle. Typically, if you have a metric in polar coordinates such as: $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + a^2(t,r) dr^2 + r^2 d\...
1
vote
1answer
365 views

Magnetic force between two point charges

I tried to derive the magnetic force between two point-charges for iterative computation. Starting out with Lorentz force and Biot–Savart law for a point charge. $$ \vec F = q_2( - \Delta \vec{v} \...
-1
votes
1answer
187 views

Lagrangian non-relativistic limit to the non-relativistic action: lagrangian of a free particle

Let be $u=|\bar{u}|$ the speed of a free particle (at constant speed) of mass $m$ that is moving in relation to an inertial frame. Why we initially introduce the term $\epsilon$ to the free lagrangian ...
1
vote
1answer
332 views

Lagrangian formulation of free massive point particle in special relativity

I wonder if there is a way to reproduce the 4-force generalization for Newton's equation for a free particle i.e. $$ m\frac{d^2x^\mu}{d \tau^2} = 0, \qquad \text{ for } \, \mu =0,1,2,3, \tag{1} $$ ...
1
vote
1answer
85 views

What is the reasoning that leads one to postulate this second form for the relativistic particle action?

The action for the free relativistic particle with worldline $\gamma : I\subset \mathbb{R}\to M$ is $$S[\gamma]=-m\int d\lambda\sqrt{-\dot{\gamma}^a(\lambda)\dot{\gamma}_a(\lambda)}\tag{1} $$ Now, ...
1
vote
1answer
147 views

Is continuum mechanics a generalization or an approximation to point particle mechanics?

Newtonian Mechanics is usually presented as a theory of point particles (and forces). My impression of the status of continuum mechanics is that it is mostly taken as an approximate description for ...
-1
votes
2answers
185 views

Is the Lagrangian of a non-relativistic particle just $\dot{x}$?

Let $$ S= m \int_a^b \dot{x}dt $$ Using the relation $L\to L^2/2$, (see Geodesic Equation from variation: Is the squared lagrangian equivalent?) I obtain $$ S=m\int_a^b\frac{1}{2}(\dot{x})^2dt $$ ...
0
votes
1answer
68 views

Is it acceptable to add a scalar potential to the Lagrangian of a relativistic massive point particle?

Starting from $$ L=\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial X^\nu}{\partial t} \frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial t }} \tag{1} $$ One can rewrite it as $L\to L^2/2$ $$ \frac{L^2}{2}=\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu} \frac{\...
0
votes
2answers
516 views

What is a point object? [duplicate]

I am currently studying Kinematics and there's a little bit confusion about the definition of point object given in my course book NCERT(it is a standard textbook in India) which is as follows : ...
0
votes
0answers
29 views

General force between two point particles, one of which has “spin”

Consider two points in the empty (isotropic and homogeneous) space: since the only vector that "makes sense" (the only vector that we can define) is the vector given by the difference of the two ...
6
votes
4answers
2k views

Is charge point-like or a smear?

Coulomb gave the law for the force between two static charges while considering them to be points in space. But the differential form of Gauss' Law talks about charge densities, a thing possible only ...
1
vote
1answer
67 views

Point particles as the limit of a short string

There's a common saying in the domain of the study of classical relativistic strings, that in the limit of a very short string, the action reduces to that of a point particle (there is for instance a ...
6
votes
1answer
106 views

Solving free particles with Fourier series

Here's a silly idea : take the action of a free particle, $$S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \dot{x}^2 dt$$ Our configuration space is the space of $C^1$ functions over $[t_1, t_2]$, which is spanned by the ...
1
vote
1answer
149 views

Do elementary particles have a density?

The SM supposes elementary particles are structureless unless composite objects like hadrons. For bosons, that can occupy the same state, we can define energy or mass density. The same happens but ...
18
votes
5answers
3k views

How can electric field be defined as force per charge, if the charge makes its own, singular electric field?

The electric field $\bf{E}$ represents how much force would act on a particle at a certain position per unit charge. However, if we actually place a particle in that position, the electric field will ...
1
vote
1answer
46 views

Electromagnetic field of a point charge seen from a rotating reference frame

Let us consider a point charge sitting in the origin of our coordinate system. If we change to a rotating system, will the field of the point charge still look the same? Intuitively I would say yes, ...
1
vote
0answers
24 views

Equilibration of a solid body with two points particles

How do I find $\theta$ as it $\theta (m,d,l) and AB=L$? And the cane which holds the two points particles(mass) is massless . In A the point mass is $3M$ and in B the mass is $M$ where there is no ...
2
votes
1answer
67 views

Sizes of Elementary Particles

Present observation shows that elementary particles have no internal structure, and have no real size as they are described by wavefunction. Something that therefore confuses me is that on a lot of ...
1
vote
1answer
108 views

Do point particles really exist? [closed]

The vast theories of physics (and mathematics) lay on the notion of material point. However, relativity and quantum mechanics cast doubts about the ultimate existence of zero-dimensional points: ...
49
votes
6answers
9k views

Do electrons have shape?

According to the Wikipedia page on the electron: The electron has no known substructure. Hence, it is defined or assumed to be a point particle with a point charge and no spatial extent. Does ...
0
votes
1answer
122 views

Rotation of a Point Particle

I wonder if there is a meaning of rotation for a point particle. Does a point particle have angular momentum and does he reply to torque?
0
votes
1answer
101 views

What is dipolar charge distribution?

An electric dipole is a system of two opposite point charges when their separation goes to zero and their charge goes to infinity in a way that the product of the charge and the separation remains ...
3
votes
2answers
219 views

Is it possible to have mass with zero volume?

As we had always studied that matter occupied space and has mass and our universe is made of matter so do that mean that there is no case where mass is present without volume .
1
vote
0answers
47 views

Point-like particle vs naked singularity? [duplicate]

In general, physics seems to consider elementary particles such as electrons to be point-like. On the other hand, naked singularities seem to cause all sorts of trouble, including closed time-like ...
1
vote
1answer
92 views

Empty space inside of atoms [duplicate]

Since most of the space between the nucleus and electron is empty space is that space in a vacuum? I’ve not seen any info on this online or in textbooks does anyone have anything on this?
3
votes
2answers
259 views

Doesn't the fact that elementary particles are not black holes prove they are not point structures? [duplicate]

De Schwarzschild radius of a mass $m$ is defined as $$r_s=\frac{2mG}{c^2}(m).$$ So if we insert in this formula the mass of an electron (a point particle, according to mainstream physics), which ...
26
votes
8answers
7k views

How can neutral atoms have exactly zero electric field when there is a difference in the positions of the charges? [duplicate]

It is said that atoms with the same number of electrons as protons are electrically neutral, so they have no net charge or net electric field. A particle with charge cannot exist at the same position ...
0
votes
1answer
58 views

Question about point particle vs. wave equation location

Another uncertainty question, this came up in another forum. As I understand it an electron, for example, is a point-like particle. I take this to mean it exhibits dimensionless properties, but ...
1
vote
2answers
215 views

How can 0-dimensional particles or 1-dimensional strings be 3D matter? [closed]

According to the latest information we got String theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings....
4
votes
1answer
165 views

Two Questions about Path Integral from “Gauge Fields and Strings” by Polyakov

My questions are about worldline path integrals from the book Gauge Fields and Strings of Polyakov. On page 153, chapter 9, he says Let us begin with the following path integral \begin{align} &...
0
votes
2answers
223 views

When would an object not be considered a point-particle in relation to gravity?

When is the Earth, for example, not considered a point in relation to gravity? I am thinking that if one was asking a question below the crust continously to the core, then this would be an example. ...
1
vote
0answers
34 views

Shape of electron [duplicate]

Today, in the BBC Science section, a headline reads that the Imperial College of London has determined that the shape of the electron is completely spherical. In a physics book I'm reading now, the ...
-3
votes
1answer
72 views

When/Why Did Physics Discard The Point Charge As An Accurate Representation? [closed]

Is there anything about the implications of the "early" quantum theory of Schrodinger equation, wave-particle duality, or the two slit experiment that conflicts with the idea of a point charge? Did ...
2
votes
1answer
208 views

Finding a 'vector potential' such that $\mathbf E = \nabla\times \mathbf C$ for a point charge

Supposedly, "Any divergence-free vector field can be expressed as the curl of some other divergence-free vector field" over a simply-connected domain. So, what is one such vector potential which ...
0
votes
2answers
60 views

Can an electron pass through a gap smaller than an electron?

If an electron (photon) can pass through a gap smaller than an electron (photon) then it is a wave otherwise it it a particle. Is this a correct way of reasoning?
3
votes
2answers
157 views

Geodesic equations from action with auxiliary field

A textbook says that the geodesic equations (for both massive and massless) can be derived from the following action: $$ S = -\frac{1}{2} \int d\tau \:\eta \: (\eta^{-2} \dot{x}^\mu \dot{x}^\nu g_{\...