Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
159 views

Proving that the Lagrangian of a free particle depends only on $|\boldsymbol{v}|^2$

The question is NOT answered by Deriving the Lagrangian for a free particle, as the answers therein assume the quadratic dependence, which is what I am trying to prove. Additionally, while one of the ...
Mark199612's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
77 views

Translational invariance $\neq $ Galilean invariance?

I have the impression that some literature say that Galilean invariance is broken by a uniform lattice. That is, although a uniform lattice like a tight binding model is translationally invariant, it ...
poisson's user avatar
  • 2,165
1 vote
0 answers
58 views

Independence of Lagrange function from time and position

In Landau & Lifshitz "Mechanics", it is said that from the time/space homogeneity Lagrange function is independent from time/position. I always thought that homogeneity means that motion ...
qqq qqq's user avatar
  • 39
2 votes
1 answer
247 views

Action of free particle is invariant under Galilean transformation / Transformation of derivative

I want to show that the action of a free particle is invariant under a Galilean transformation $$ (t,\vec{x})\rightarrow (t+a,R\vec{x}+\vec{v}t+b)=(t^\prime, \vec{x}^\prime) \quad\text{where}\quad R\...
Silas's user avatar
  • 405
2 votes
1 answer
132 views

What is the symmetry group of a particle interacting with external fields?

I am following along with Ballentine's (in his Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development) construction/identification of symmetry generators as operators representing the standard observables (...
EE18's user avatar
  • 1,261
5 votes
4 answers
692 views

"Deriving" Newton's laws of motion from symmetry assumptions

It is often discussed how certain symmetries and conservation laws can be derived from Newton's laws of motion. My question is: can we go the other way? Can Newton's laws of motion be derived only ...
Roee Hendel's user avatar
8 votes
4 answers
2k views

Doesn't Newton's equation of motion have a bigger invariance group than the Galilean group?

Newton's equation ${F}^i=m\frac{d^2x^i}{dt^2}$ is unchanged in form, under the Galilean group: (i) under a translation of the origin of coordinates, (ii) rotation of coordinates, and (iii) Galilean ...
Solidification's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
298 views

Is there any proof of Galilean Transformation?

Is there any proof of Galilean Transformation? Is it proved from experiment, theory or it simply is an axiom?
abcxyzklmn's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
310 views

Isn't a rotation just a sum of many translations?

If the world is (really or hypothetically) made of elementary, point-particles, then it's there such a thing as rotation? Point particles by definition can't rotate around themselves. The only ...
Juan Perez's user avatar
  • 3,002
0 votes
1 answer
272 views

Galilean Symmetry of Newtonian Mechanics

So for the equations of motion to be symmetric about a transformation from $(t,x)$ to $(\tau, y)$, the following must be true (for Newtonian mechanics): $$m \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = f \left( x, \frac{dx}{...
Bilal Salha's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
727 views

What is a time-dependent symmetry in Hamiltonian mechanics?

I've read something from John Baez which I don't understand: If we consider a single nonrelativistic free particle - in one-dimensional space, to keep life simple - and describe its state by its ...
mma's user avatar
  • 757
1 vote
0 answers
344 views

How does Galilean invariance lead to equality of "mass" flux and momentum density?

Let us consider a fluid, with spacetime translation symmetry, and one internal $U(1)$ symmetry. Corresponding to the spatial translation symmetry, we can write down a momentum conservation equation ...
insomniac's user avatar
  • 760
0 votes
0 answers
54 views

Inertial frame definition in Rindler Introduction to STR vs Landau' & Lifshitz Mechanics

Juxtaposing Rindler's Introduction to STR (page 7) vs Landau's Mechanics (page 5) inertial frame definition,I get that rindler assumes frame moving uniformly w.r.t inertial frame as an inertial frame ...
Ashley Chraya's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
266 views

Inertial frames as in Landau & Lifshhitz mechanics 1st chapter

If we see inertial frames from a basic point of view (precisely more basic axiom from which I can at least derive the law of free body as in landau mechanics first chapter) that inertial frames are ...
Ashley Chraya's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
46 views

Galilei group and Constrained QM

Let's assume spin-0 for simplicity. So far as I understand the issue, the Galilei simmetries constraints the possible hamiltonians of a quantum systems so that the only possible interactions of a ...
AndresB's user avatar
  • 458
1 vote
1 answer
316 views

Issue showing that the phase of a harmonic wave is invariant under a Galilean transform

The phase $Φ$ of wave is defined as $kx-wt$. It should be the case that all observers moving relative to each other in the non relativistic case will agree on this. So given the transforms $x'=x-vt$ ...
Vishal Jain's user avatar
  • 1,545
1 vote
1 answer
182 views

Lagrangian of free particle - classical case

I have a question, more related to a mathematical aspect of physics, which seems I am not understanding very well. So, by applying Galilean transformation between two reference frames, which move at ...
600nebo's user avatar
  • 19
3 votes
1 answer
2k views

The Lagrangian of a free particle in Landau & Lifshitz

In Landau & Lifshitz's derivation of the Lagrangian of a free particle in a galilean frame of reference one finds the following argument: the equations of motion in two galilean frames must be ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

Symmetries on a finite Euclidean spacetime and an infinite Euclidean spacetime

Consider the following: The Euclidean plane has $3$ translation symmetries and $3$ rotation symmetries. Any physical quantity $K(x,y)$ on the Euclidean plane, where $x$ and $y$ are two arbitrary ...
nightmarish's user avatar
  • 3,243
-2 votes
1 answer
173 views

Symmetry properties of time and space in non-inertial frames

Are symmetry properties of time and space true for non-inertial frames? If yes, how? If no, why not? Please, can you explain? We already know that an important feature of inertial frames is the ...
Harshit Tiwari's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
891 views

Question on Galilean transformation

Let $a$ be a scalar, $D$ a rotation matrix and $b$ and $v$ are $1\times 3$-vectors. We had the following Galiean transformation: $(t, x(t)) \to (t + a, Dx + b + v\cdot t)$ But why is it not $(t, x(...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
56 views

Why should the potential of a non-relativistic isolated system be velocity independent?

The lagrangian function of an non-relativistic isolated system of point masses is $$L=\sum_i\frac{m_i}{2}\dot{\vec r}_i^2-V,$$ where the potential function $V$ represents all interactions. If we ...
Diracology's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
394 views

Why position and velocity are symmetries and acceleration is not?

Position and velocity are symmetries. The law of physics do not change if the observer changes his position or velocity. But acceleration which is just a derivative of velocity is not a symmetry. In ...
veronika's user avatar
  • 2,786
8 votes
1 answer
4k views

Galilean transformation in non-relativistic quantum mechanics

I'm reading Weinberg's Lectures on Quantum Mechanics and in chapter 3 he discusses invariance under Galilean transformations in the general context of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Being a ...
Alex V.'s user avatar
  • 732
4 votes
2 answers
572 views

Why does Galilean invariance imply that particles that start rest stay on the same line?

I'm reading Arnol'd for self study. I'm struggling with this question: "Show that any system of two particles will remain on the same line that connected them at the initial moment, if they started at ...
11Kilobytes's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
399 views

Galilean relativity in QM

Intro I've been trying to show that the generator of boosts can be written in operator form as can be seen here, as: $$ B = \sum_i m_i x_i(t) - t \sum_i p_i $$ As a reminder the transformation ...
Yair M's user avatar
  • 705
6 votes
2 answers
140 views

Possible mechanics based on the known symmetries in the nature (investigating rumor)

Somewhere I've heard about a relative new mathematical result regarding mechanics. Specifically, there is a list of the known symmetries of mechanics (both Newtonian and relativistic), i.e. different ...
peterh's user avatar
  • 8,338
1 vote
0 answers
136 views

Galilean Transform

I tried to solve a problem using two different ways and I had some trouble, the problem is: We define a symmetry transform of the expected value of $\vec{P}$ like this: $$\langle \psi|\vec{P}|\psi \...
spectator's user avatar
  • 103
9 votes
2 answers
1k views

Casimir Invariants of the Galilean group

I had studied a couple of things about Galilean and Poincare group. But in the Galilean group, there is not enough clarity on how to calculate generators for boosts ($B_i$), which if I do it seems I ...
user35952's user avatar
  • 3,134
2 votes
2 answers
855 views

Mechanics Landau Galilean Principle

I started reading Landau's Mechanics book and was having some trouble understanding the Galilean Relativity Principle. What does Landau mean by saying space to be homogenous and isotropic and time is ...
Isomorphic's user avatar
  • 1,586
3 votes
2 answers
24k views

Lorentz and Galilean transformation

I read about Lorentz and Galilean transformation in a book of modern physics some days back, but couldn't clearly understand the difference between the two? Also it was stated there that maxwell's ...
kakashi's user avatar
  • 63
5 votes
4 answers
4k views

Maxwell equations invariant under Lorentz transformation but not Galilean transformations

Why Maxwell equations are not invariant under Galilean transformations, but invariant under Lorentz transformations? What is the deep physical meaning behind it?
Timothy's user avatar
  • 2,489
30 votes
5 answers
9k views

Galilean invariance of Lagrangian for non-relativistic free point particle?

In QFT, the Lagrangian density is explicitly constructed to be Lorentz-invariant from the beginning. However the Lagrangian $$L = \frac{1}{2} mv^2$$ for a non-relativistic free point particle is ...
Whelp's user avatar
  • 4,156