Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
46 views

D Alembert Wave Equation is not Gallean Invariant but Why y=Asin(wt-kx) is Gallean Invariant? [duplicate]

I just watched this video from MIT 8.04 Quantum Physics I by Barton Zwiebach, explaining Galilean transformation of y=Asin(wt-kx). I have a confusion, are ordinary waves Galilean invariant or not? ...
Dibyajit Bhattacharyya's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
205 views

Forces that are invariant under Galilean spacetime rescaling $\mathbf x' = \lambda \mathbf x$, $t' = \lambda^2 t$

Consider a force of the form $$ m \ddot{\mathbf x}(t) = -k\frac{\mathbf x(t) - \mathbf x_0}{|\mathbf x(t) - \mathbf x_0|^d}. $$ For what values of $d$ is this force invariant under the Galilean ...
Chris Yang's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
169 views

Invariance over Galilean transformation [closed]

I want to prove that the Wave Equation is not invariant under Galilean Transformation. I'm having a little trouble with it but this is my attempt. 1. First of all, what does it mean by "not ...
ludicrous's user avatar
  • 149
2 votes
0 answers
137 views

What do these Casimir invariants of the Galilean group physically represent?

There exist Casimir invariants of the Galilean group which commute with all the generators of the group. They are, of course, Galilean scalars (i.e., scalars under space and time translations, ...
Solidification's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
292 views

Can we write the mass $M$, a Casimir invariant of the Galilean group, as a function of its generators?

According to Wikipedia, the mass $M$ is one of the Casimir invariants of the Galilean group. Casimir invariants of a group are made out of the generators, and they commute with all the generators of ...
Solidification's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
55 views

Lattice Gas Automata and Galilean Invariance

I have been studying Lattice Gas Automata methods (also this), and every time I read up on their drawbacks, I see that they are not Galilean invariant and that the simulations have statistical noise. ...
megamence's user avatar
  • 707
2 votes
0 answers
49 views

What is the role of the mass Casimir invariant in Galilean and what it's actual role in special relativity? [closed]

What is the role of the (mass) Casimir invariant of the algebra of relativistic symmetries in Galilean and what it's actual role in special relativity?
Chakalaka's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
744 views

Can Galilean transformation be derived from length invariance?

Given length invariance in Euclidean 3D space between two inertial frames:$$ds^2=ds'^2$$ Can Galilean transformation be derived like Lorentz transformation derived from space-time interval invariance?
rioiong's user avatar
  • 613
6 votes
2 answers
711 views

Most fundamental reason for Newtonian KE loss being invariant in inelastic collisions

This answer to a question about why Newtonian kinetic energy is quadratic in velocity shows that if an inelastic collision's KE loss is invariant under Newtonian boosts it has to quadruple when ...
J.G.'s user avatar
  • 25.4k
2 votes
1 answer
69 views

What is actually meant when it is said Scalar is invariant?

As far as i know a quantity is called invariant if it satisfies some specific transformations. Now,Suppose a body is moving with velocity $\vec{v}$ as measured from the lab frame.Its non-relativistic ...
Manas Dogra's user avatar
  • 1,108
0 votes
1 answer
95 views

time invariance for "Translations" versus "Galilean transformations"

Why would the time coordinate (t) be NOT invariant under translations, but invariant under Galilean transformations? I thought it should be invariant under both Here is what I'm tying to understand:
An Ignorant Wanderer's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
316 views

Issue showing that the phase of a harmonic wave is invariant under a Galilean transform

The phase $Φ$ of wave is defined as $kx-wt$. It should be the case that all observers moving relative to each other in the non relativistic case will agree on this. So given the transforms $x'=x-vt$ ...
Vishal Jain's user avatar
  • 1,545
2 votes
1 answer
976 views

Newton's theory of gravity is covariant under Galilean transformations

We know from classical mechanics that the gravitational field equation for the scalar potential takes the form $$\nabla^2\phi=4\pi \rho,$$ where $\rho$ is mass density (which, can depend on time and ...
Cosmologee's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
1k views

How length is an invariant in Euclidean space?

The special theory of relativity shows that intervals are invariant under Lorentz transform in the Minkowski space -time. But how can we prove (any postulates or theory) that the length is an ...
walber97's user avatar
  • 1,408
3 votes
2 answers
432 views

Are there Galilean scalars?

In special relativity there are scalar quantities which are invariant under any Lorentz transformation, called Lorentz scalars. For example, the magnitude of the four-velocity is a Lorentz scalar. If ...
Francesco Manzali's user avatar