Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5 votes
2 answers
628 views

Confusion about Noether's Theorem

In classical mechanics, a transformation $q \rightarrow q + \delta q$ is a symmetry if the resultant change in the Lagrangian is a total derivative, $$ \delta L = \frac{dF}{dt}.$$ If we derive the ...
Bilge K. Aksebzeci's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
15 views

Gauge invariance using equations of motion [duplicate]

I am working with a lagrangian on a homework problem. I expect it to have some gauge invariance. I can show that the Lagranian is invariant under those (gauge) tansformations but I have to use ...
baba26's user avatar
  • 542
3 votes
0 answers
69 views

Consequences for symmetries of the equations of motion in QFT

In general, if a Quantum Field Theory is described by a Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}$, the symmetries of $\mathcal{L}$ lead to classically conserved currents along the equations of motion and Ward ...
Marcosko's user avatar
  • 382
3 votes
2 answers
598 views

Deriving conserved charges from the equations of motion

It is very well established how to derive conserved charges associated to the symmetries of Lagrangian using the Noether's theorem. Also in the Hamiltonian formulation, we know how to derive the ...
Ali Seraj's user avatar
  • 1,140
1 vote
1 answer
183 views

Equations of motion describing a great circle

I'd like to argue that equations of motions of the form $$\ddot \varphi = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad \ddot\theta = \sin\theta\cos\theta\dot\varphi^2$$ describe a great circle. I think the standard ...
Sito's user avatar
  • 1,235
5 votes
3 answers
425 views

In what sense are the equations of motion conserved by symmetries?

I am studying variational principles and I have been reading this set of notes by Townsend. In the first paragraph of Section 9, Townsend defines what it means for a transformation to be a symmetry of ...
MB10000's user avatar
  • 51
2 votes
2 answers
444 views

Rotation as an example of symmetry in classical mechanics

I modified the question because it was confused. On my book there is this mathematical definition of symmetry transformation: "The equations of motion have a symmetry, if the solutions of the ...
SimoBartz's user avatar
  • 1,978
13 votes
3 answers
655 views

Why intuitively, do we define symmetries as transformations that map solutions of the equations of motion into other solutions?

Of course, strictly speaking, a symmetry is always a transformation that leaves a given object unchanged. But I'm curious why observable symmetries of physical systems are exactly those ...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
2 votes
3 answers
299 views

Are symmetries in the equation necessarily symmetries in the corresponding solution(s)?

I wonder whether the symmetries in the equations (such as the heat equation, the wave equation, the Schrödinger equation, Maxwell equations) are reflected into their solution(s). I.e., assuming that ...
untreated_paramediensis_karnik's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
677 views

Is it valid to replace the equations of motion inside a symmetry?

For example, this symmetry: $$\delta q^{i}=\epsilon(q^{i}-2\dot{q}^{i}t)$$ it's derivative is: $$\delta\dot{q}^{i}=-\epsilon(\dot{q}^i +2\ddot{q}^i t)$$ There appears $\ddot{q}^{i}$ in this ...
rsaavedra's user avatar
  • 862