Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
143 views

Does the path integral approach to QFT have equations of motion? [duplicate]

In the canonical quantization approach for QFT, we deal with operators & their (anti)commutation relations. However, at the same time, we say that the field operators are the solutions of equation ...
TrentKent6's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
575 views

Conceptual question about Euler-Lagrange equations in Quantum Field Theory

So I've started going down the QFT rabbit hole aided by Schwartz's book "Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model". On chapter 7, the first method used to find the position-space Feynman ...
FranDahab's user avatar
  • 409
7 votes
3 answers
1k views

Euler-Lagrangian equation of motion of quantum fields in QFT

A canonical way of doing quantum field theory is by starting with some Lagrangian, for example, that of free scalar field $$L=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial^{\mu}\phi-\frac{1}{2}m\phi^2$$ Then ...
Tan Tixuan's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
1k views

What the role of classical equation of motion in quantum field theory?

I've learnt quantum field theory for a semester but I still can't understand the role of classical equation of motion in QFT. I have looked up for several books. They all discuss classical field ...
Taveren Sa's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
641 views

Can I really take the classical field equations at face value in QFT?

To be concrete, let's say I have a relativistic $\phi^4$ theory [with Minkowski signature $(+,-,-,-)$] $$ \tag{1} \mathcal{L} ~=~ \frac{1}{2} \left ( \partial_{\mu} \phi \partial^{\mu} \phi - m^2 \...
Pth's user avatar
  • 71