Questions tagged [clifford-algebra]

The tag has no usage guidance.

21 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
10
votes
0answers
210 views

Can change in position due to acceleration be expressed using dual quaternions?

Dual quaternions seem like an appealing way to model 6DOF motion since they linearize rotation. I've reviewed what literature I can find on then, and found expressions for translation and change in ...
4
votes
0answers
119 views

Physical/geometrical interpretations of spinors?

Physically, a scalar is a quantity invariant with reference frame, a vector is a quantity associated with a direction, tensors are higher relationships between vectors - what are spinors? I thought I ...
4
votes
0answers
212 views

Subgroups of the Clifford Group

We recall the definition of a Clifford group (over $n$ qubits) is the set of unitary transformations: $$\{U: UPU^\dagger\in\mathcal{P}\}$$ where $\mathcal{P}$ denotes the corresponding Pauli group (...
3
votes
0answers
195 views

Geometric Algebra formulation of EM in nonuniform dielectric media

Normally, there is a straightforward formulation of Maxwell's equations in free space under the GA framework, which reduces to (picking the right units): $$ \nabla F = \mu_0 J $$ with some ...
2
votes
0answers
247 views

Gamma matrices in higher (even) spacetime dimensions

Suppose we write the gamma matrices in this following representation: \begin{align*} \gamma^{0}=\begin{pmatrix} \,\,0 & \mathbb{1}_{2}\,\,\\ \,\,\mathbb{1}_{2} & 0\,\, \end{...
2
votes
0answers
189 views

How this spinor identity is shown?

In one QFT problem it is asked to prove the following identity: $$\overline{u}_\sigma(p)\gamma^\mu u_{\sigma'}(p)=2\delta_{\sigma\sigma'}p^\mu.$$ Considering $u_\sigma$ the basis solutions to the ...
2
votes
0answers
79 views

From $\gamma$ to $\sigma$, finding proper basis

For $d$ dimensional case, usual gamma matrices have basis $\Gamma^A = \{1, \gamma^a, \cdots \gamma^{a_1 \cdots a_d}\}$ (Let's think about even case only for simplicity, I know for odd case only up to ...
1
vote
0answers
75 views

Dirac matrices for generalized metric tensors

The Dirac matrices are defined by the relations $$\left [\gamma^{i},\gamma^{j}\right]_{+}=2\eta^{i,j}\mathbb{1}$$ where $[\cdot,\cdot]_{+}$ is the anti-commutator. What happens if I replace $\eta^{i,...
1
vote
0answers
75 views

Completeness relation of spin matrices

I was reading Hugh Osborne's notes on Conformal Field theory and came across a completeness relation which seems easy to prove but I am unable to do it. ${(s_{\mu\nu})}_{\alpha}^{\beta}{(s^{\mu\nu})}...
1
vote
0answers
41 views

Question about Pauli Matrices

I found the following identities about Pauli matrices from the lecture notes of Supersymmetry. $$((\sigma^{\mu})^{\alpha\dot{\alpha}})^{\ast}=(\bar{\sigma}^{\mu})^{\dot{\alpha}\alpha}$$ $$((\sigma_{\...
1
vote
0answers
158 views

Relation between Dirac spinors, quaternions, and bicomplex numbers

Superficially Dirac spinor resp. Dirac gamma matrices and quaternions and bicomplex numbers seems to be very similar objects. all can be expressed by unitary 4x4 matrices so they seem to represent ...
1
vote
0answers
240 views

Weyl and Majorana-Weyl spinors why need commutation?

Let $\psi$ denote a Dirac spinor then Weyl spinors are defined by: $$\psi_{L,R}=\frac{1}{2} (I\pm \gamma)\psi$$ on even dimensions $\gamma$ commutes with $\sigma_{\mu \nu}$ (generators used to define ...
1
vote
0answers
169 views

Dimension of Representation of Majorana Fermions with Euclidean Metric?

It is possible to represent the Dirac matrices in the Majorana basis using $N= 2^{⌊d/2⌋}$-dimensional matrices, as shown here. This source uses a Minkowski metric. It would then be possible to move to ...
1
vote
0answers
339 views

Are Fock spaces just a special type of tensor algebra?

Are Fock spaces just a special type of tensor algebra? The definitions I am using: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fock_space http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_algebra From what I can tell, the ...
0
votes
1answer
35 views

Spinorial representation of Lorentz group for solution to Dirac equation

In my relativistic quantum mechanics course, we found plane wave solution to the Dirac equation by first studying it the reference frame of the particle. Using a plane wave solution for both positive ...
0
votes
0answers
43 views

Traces of gamma matrices in $d$ dimensions

For $d=4$, some identities of the traces of gamma matrices are: $tr[\gamma_\mu] = 0$ $tr[\gamma_\mu \gamma_\nu ] = 4g_{\mu\nu}$ $tr[\gamma_\mu\gamma_\alpha\gamma_\nu] = 0$ $tr[\gamma_\mu\gamma_\alpha\...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Is there a Cauchy integeal formula in Geometric algebra (GA) or space-time algebra or clifford algebra>

I am curious about Cauchy integral formula which is generalized to Clifford algebra especially Cl(1,3). If you are familiar with paper or theorems about this subject and share them. It will be very ...
0
votes
0answers
27 views

Why is there a negative sign in the (non-relativistic) bivector formulation of the Lorentz force?

I'm currently trying to update my understanding of basic (Newtonian, non-relativistic) physics to use bivectors and Clifford products instead of pseudovectors and cross products. And I've come up ...
0
votes
0answers
39 views

About elements “factorization” in Clifford Algebras

the article linked below is very instructive and advanced about real Clifford Algebras, and their relationship with Lorentz group. After a general introduction of a Clifford algebra, $\mathcal{Cl}(V,\...
0
votes
0answers
109 views

How are the covariant Pauli matrices defined?

When doing calculations with Weyl spinors, terms like $\theta\sigma^\mu\theta^\dagger$ appear. I know that for 3+1 spacetime dimensions, $\sigma^\mu = (\textbf{1}, \sigma^i)$ with $i=1,2,3$ the usual ...
0
votes
0answers
312 views

Spinors in dimensions greater than $4$

The Dirac equation describes the behaviour of non-interacting spin-$1/2$ fermions in a quantum-field-theoretic framework and is given by $$i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi=-m\psi,$$ where $\gamma^{\...