Linked Questions

11 votes
1 answer
3k views

How do you determine the Lagrangian? [duplicate]

I have always been puzzled by how do you arrive at Lagrangians? That is, how do you know that the functional you need to get Newton's equations is $$L = T-V(x)~?$$ Do you derive the Lagrangian ...
GRrocks's user avatar
  • 2,748
0 votes
0 answers
1k views

Derivation of Euler-Lagrange equations from Newton's second law [duplicate]

I was thinking about this for some time and I wanted to clarify my question. Can the Euler-Lagrange equation be somehow derived from Newton's second law? Here's a possible way to do it: We start with ...
Don Al's user avatar
  • 1,062
2 votes
1 answer
770 views

Why is the Lagrangian defined as $L=T - V$? [duplicate]

Please try to provide a sufficient answer, and when it is just „because it satisfies Newton‘s equations“, please try to give an example or explain it. If you know it, I would be very happy if you ...
Merkur Weimer's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
572 views

Lagrangian intuition [duplicate]

I am new to lagrangian mechanics and it just baffles me the idea of subtracting potential energy from kinetic energy. Why don't we use kinetic energy alone and the least action path (between two ...
mohamed's user avatar
  • 113
0 votes
0 answers
283 views

The principle of least action [duplicate]

I have read about the principle of least action. This principle suggests that nature would allow a particle to travel in a path along which the integral of the difference between kinetic energy and ...
Agnivesh Singh's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
136 views

Reason behind $L = T - V$ (Lagrangian formalism) [duplicate]

I've been learning about the Lagrangian formulation recently, and while I'm with the process, I am still struggling somewhat with the theory behind it. As I (rather poorly) understand it, the ...
Kwarrtz's user avatar
  • 153
-1 votes
1 answer
114 views

Lagrangian in Classical Mechanics [duplicate]

Where can I find the ab-initio derivation of the Lagrangian in classical mechanics? How did Lagrange arrive at $L=T-V$ ? Respected Experts kindly explain to me. What is the need to construct $L=T-V$ ...
K Kulasekarapandian's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
92 views

How can the action can describe a movement? What is the argument behind? [duplicate]

We define the action of a system as $$S(q)=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}L(t,q(t),q'(t))dt,$$ where $q(t)$ is the evolution of the system and $L$ is the Lagrangien. How can a stationary point of $S$ can describe ...
idm's user avatar
  • 141
0 votes
1 answer
89 views

Lagrangian function $L = T- U$ & Lagrange's book "Mécanique analytique" [duplicate]

Lagrangian is function of generalized co-ordinates, generalized velocities and time: $$L=L(q,\dot{q},t)$$ Why the specific form $L=T-U$ is used as a definition of Lagrangian function? Here as usual $T,...
atom's user avatar
  • 1,034
1 vote
0 answers
67 views

Action in Lagrangian Mechanics [duplicate]

I editted this question since it was closed because it is a duplicate. However, answers in the referenced question didn't solve my question, so I am writing it again. Lagrangian mechanics is built ...
Dario Mirić's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
61 views

Origin of Hamilton's variational principle [duplicate]

My question is what is the theoretical origin of Hamilton's principle. I mean is there any rigorous mathematical proof of this principle from some more basic principles?
Aranyak Ghosh's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
54 views

Question regarding the motivation behind finding Lagrangian [duplicate]

The Lagrangian method uses the Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy to give us the equation of motion, that's well and good. But it seems too random to define a quantity called $L$ (action). The ...
Harry Case's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
50 views

Why identify the Lagrangian as kinetic energy minus potential energy? [duplicate]

When deriving the Euler-Lagrange equations from the Principle of Stationary Action we start by insisting that the actual path of a particle minimizes the action $S$, defined as $$S=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}\...
Ben Johnson's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
45 views

How Lagrangian equations of motions can be obtained from Newton's laws? [duplicate]

Let's consider a system of $N$ point particles. Let's also assume that acceleration of each particle is a function of positions of all the particles. I assume that for such a system we can prove that ...
Roman's user avatar
  • 137
1 vote
0 answers
39 views

Is there a way to derive Principle of Least Action from Newton's laws instead of other ways around? [duplicate]

If we start from $ m\ddot{x} = -\frac{dV}{dx} $ How could one derive/construct principle of least action? i.e. find out that this quantity $ S = \int_{t_0}^{t_1}dt\left(\frac{m\dot{x}^2}{2} - V(x) \...
Alexandre Gurchumelia's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
36 views

Why does the Lagrangian equal $T-V$? [duplicate]

When defining $L=T-V$, and using Euler-Lagrange equations ($\partial_x L = \frac{d}{dt} \partial_{\dot{x}} L$), we get back $m \ddot{x} = - \frac{dV}{dx}$ ONLY WHEN ASSUMING that $V(x, \dot{x}) = V(x)$...
Dor Harpaz's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
35 views

Derive $L = T - U$, in newtonian mechanics, assuming the principle of least action [duplicate]

I am trying to get a better understanding of the Lagrangian. From what I know, we say that each trajectory in physics must be a path that is at a minimum, which means that is satisfies the Euler-...
DLG03's user avatar
  • 1
85 votes
15 answers
15k views

What are examples of Lagrangians that not of the form $T-U$?

My Physics teacher was reluctant to define Lagrangian as Kinetic Energy minus Potential Energy because he said that there were cases where a system's Lagrangian did not take this form. Are you are ...
ZAC's user avatar
  • 1,297
128 votes
10 answers
40k views

Why the Principle of Least Action?

I'll be generous and say it might be reasonable to assume that nature would tend to minimize, or maybe even maximize, the integral over time of $T-V$. Okay, fine. You write down the action ...
Jonathan Gleason's user avatar
57 votes
7 answers
20k views

Why should an action integral be stationary? On what basis did Hamilton state this principle?

Hamilton's principle states that a dynamic system always follows a path such that its action integral is stationary (that is, maximum or minimum). Why should the action integral be stationary? On ...
tsudot's user avatar
  • 971
17 votes
7 answers
11k views

Motivation for form $L = T - V$ of Lagrangian

This question (in Lagrangian mechanics) might be silly, but why is the Lagrangian $L$ defined as: $L = T - V$? I understand that the total mechanical energy of an isolated system is conserved, and ...
Frank's user avatar
  • 3,403
24 votes
4 answers
6k views

Why can't we ascribe a (possibly velocity dependent) potential to a dissipative force?

Sorry if this is a silly question but I cant get my head around it.
yayu's user avatar
  • 4,822
28 votes
3 answers
6k views

Are there examples in classical mechanics where D'Alembert's principle fails?

D'Alembert's principle suggests that the work done by the internal forces for a virtual displacement of a mechanical system in harmony with the constraints is zero. This is obviously true for the ...
Larry Harson's user avatar
  • 5,278
24 votes
2 answers
2k views

Lagrangian Mechanics - Commutativity Rule $\frac{d}{dt}\delta q=\delta \frac{dq}{dt} $

I am reading about Lagrangian mechanics. At some point the difference between the temporal derivative of a variation and variation of the temporal derivative is discussed. The fact that the two are ...
user37155's user avatar
  • 271
17 votes
1 answer
3k views

What does a Lagrangian of the form $L=m^2\dot x^4 +U(x)\dot x^2 -W(x)$ represent?

I saw this Lagrangian in notes I have printed: $$ L\left(x,\frac{dx}{dt}\right) = \frac{m^2}{12}\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^4 + m\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2\times V(x) -V^2(x). $$ (It appears in the ...
0x90's user avatar
  • 3,316
14 votes
4 answers
2k views

Connection between different kinds of "Lagrangian"

Being a physic student I first heard the term: "Lagrangian" during a course about Lagrangian mechanics; at that time this term was defined to me in the following way: For a classic, non ...
Noumeno's user avatar
  • 4,474
6 votes
4 answers
2k views

Why Lagrangian is negative number for a relativistic massive point particle?

In the special relativistic action for a massive point particle, $$S=\int_{t_i}^{t_f}\mathcal {L}dt,$$ why is the Lagrangian $$\mathcal {L}=-E_o\gamma^{-1}$$ a negative number?
antoni's user avatar
  • 123
9 votes
2 answers
3k views

When can we add a total time derivative of $f(q, \dot{q}, t)$ to a Lagrangian?

The other day, I was listening to this lecture on the Lagrangian for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field, and at one point in the video, the lecturer mentions that we can add any total time ...
EtaZetaTheta's user avatar
  • 1,511
9 votes
2 answers
1k views

Does Newtonian $F=ma$ imply the least action principle in mechanics?

I've learned that Newtonian mechanics and Lagrangian mechanics are equivalent, and Newtonian mechanics can be deduced from the least action principle. Could the least action principle $\min\int L(t,...
High GPA's user avatar
  • 417
11 votes
3 answers
1k views

Can Lagrangian mechanics be justified without referring to Newtonian mechanics?

Are there any ways of justifying Lagrangian mechanics as a foundation of classical physics, without referring to Newtonian mechanics? In other words, what is the deeper reason or intuition why $$\...
Nick Alger's user avatar
  • 2,730

15 30 50 per page