Linked Questions
11 questions linked to/from Minkowski's complex Euclidean space vs. the real pseudo-Euclidean version
0
votes
0
answers
37
views
Imaginary velocity components in geodesic [duplicate]
When we try to find the geodesic of a partical at rest, in the second term of the geodesic equation we use dt/dtau = 1. Shouldn’t it be i (for imaginary number), since the time component of the 4-...
- 209k
-3
votes
1
answer
118
views
Is time intrinsically complex? Does it have an imaginary component? [duplicate]
In twin paradox, there is an unaccounted area in the unaccelerated frame of its Space-time diagram when one frame's simultaneity is being mapped to the other; ergo period motion of pendulum in one ...
- 1
0
votes
1
answer
62
views
Minkowski product as Euclidean product plus spatial inversions
In special relativity, we write contravariant and covariant vectors respectively as $$A^\mu=(A^0, A^1, A^2, A^3), \quad A_\mu=(A_0, A_1, A_2, A_3).$$ Since $A_\mu=\eta_{\mu\nu}A^\nu$, we read off the ...
- 719
10
votes
4
answers
883
views
Is velocity an angle?
I am not a physicist. I have only rudimentary notions about the following.
I looked for similar questions on SE but I did not find any. I also tried search engines but results relate to angular ...
- 135k
0
votes
1
answer
153
views
How well does the concept or model of imaginary time work? [duplicate]
In order to make the Minkowski metric, in special relativity, equivalent to the Euclidean metric, one idea is to allow time to take imaginary values. As far as I have learned about SR, it does make ...
- 209k
1
vote
1
answer
163
views
Why the imaginary unit in time axis? [duplicate]
Why time is not like other dimensions is a real amount? In relativity time axis is $i*c*t$, where $i$ is the imaginary unit and $c$ is light speed in free space. Did science or philosophy reached to ...
- 209k
0
votes
0
answers
41
views
Notation on four-vectors using imaginary spacelike components [duplicate]
Can one just change the notation of four vectors so as instead of having $$ X^{\mu} =(X^0, \vec{X})$$we define $$ X^{\mu}=(X^0,i\vec{X})?$$ This way we could use the Euclidean metric instead of $$g^{\...
- 209k
22
votes
9
answers
11k
views
Minkowski Metric Signature
When I learned about the Minkowski Space and it's coordinates, it was explained such that the metric turns out to be $$ ds^{2} = -(c^{2}dx^{0})^{2} +(dx^{1})^{2} + (dx^{2})^{2} + (dx^{3})^{2} $$ ...
- 12.2k
1
vote
1
answer
250
views
How is a pseudo-Euclidean metric superior to Minkowski's complex metric? [duplicate]
This is my second attempt to get a meaningful response from you guys on this issue.
The SR invariance formula makes space-like intervals imaginary (e.g., the distance $x$ in a given frame has ...
- 209k
1
vote
0
answers
154
views
Minkowski's model of space-time not extendible to G.R [closed]
My latest comment:
Minkowski did not suggest CxR3. He used one (imaginary) dimension for t, & 3 real dims for space. There is no reason to think this is merely a trick. When a math representation ...
- 209k
11
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Special relativity and imaginary coefficient of the time coordinate
I read somewhere that part of Minkowski's inspiration for his formulation of Minkowski space was Poincare's observation that time could be understood as a fourth spatial dimension with an imaginary ...
- 712