4
$\begingroup$

Knowing that a body in motion experiences time dilation, "also" knowing when two objects travel at a great speed away from one an other, both observers experience the others clock as moving slower relative to themselves due to the Doppler effect "I presume". So is it safe to speculate that if observer A where stationary and observer B where in motion (disregarding time dilation for observer B) that they would mutually experience each other's time as slowing down due to the Doppler effect alone? However; taking time dilation into account for observer B, wouldn't the observed Doppler effect of observer A's slowing clock combine with the time dilation of B's to be an in-sync operation? Where if B looking back at A's clock would appear to B as time moving normal? (just to clarify: I realize this would have the reverse effect if B where to travel towards A rather then away, meaning B's time dilation combined with its more frequently emitted light pulse would then appear to A as B's time moving normally instead).

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

You are right that there are two effects at play here.

Firstly, suppose that we turn relativity off --- suppose that we consider our universe to be Newtonian, with a finite speed of light propagation. It would indeed be the case that if an observer A were moving relative to another observer B, and emitting a light signal towards B, then the rate at which the signal arrived at B would be different to that at which it was emitted. This is the plain old Doppler effect, just the same as the effect experienced when listening to an ambulance moving towards or away from you. If the signal emitted by A was the light from her clock face, then indeed observer B would see the clock tick at a different rate.

But would she see it tick more quickly or more slowly? Now that depends on whether observer A were moving towards or away from observer B. If A were moving towards B, B would see the clock tick more quickly, just as you hear the ambulance siren at a higher pitch if it is moving towards you. Likewise, if A were moving away from B, B would see the clock tick more slowly, just as you hear the ambulance siren at a lower pitch if it is moving away from you. Of course, for speeds small compared to the speed of light, this effect would be very small.

Now suppose we turn relativity on. A new effect comes into play --- one much more profound and weird. The (relativistic) phenomenon of time dilation would entail that, according to B, the clock belonging to observer A runs intrinsically more slowly. It's not that she merely sees the the clock tick more slowly, it's that time itself has slowed down aboard A's spaceship, according to B. What this means is that if B were to measure the rate of arrival of signals from A and then do some maths to undo the Doppler effect, such that the resulting quantity obtained were the rate of emission of the signal, she would find the rate to be less than that at which A would say she emitted the signal. Which is pretty nutty.

So what is the combined effect? Well, we can see immediately that they won't cancel out in all cases by considering observer A to be moving away from observer B. Then time dilation and the Doppler effect combine, such that observer B sees the clock aboard A's ship running particularly slowly. The correct formula (I won't give a derivation here, but you can find many on the web, e.g. on Wikipedia) turns out, in fact, to be

$$ f_O = f_E \sqrt{\frac{1-\beta}{1+\beta}} \,,\qquad \beta = v/c\,,$$

where $f_E$ is the emitted frequency and $f_O$ the observed frequency. For all positive velocities, which in this case corresponds to observer A moving away from observer B, the top of the fraction is smaller than the bottom, and so the observed frequency is less than the emitted frequency. Likewise, for all negative velocities, which in this case corresponds to observer A moving towards observer B, the top of the fraction is larger than the bottom, and so the observed frequency is greater than the emitted frequency.

Qualitatively, then, the two effects combined are no different from the Doppler effect by itself. The only circumstance under which the two effects 'cancel out' is when the observers' relative velocity is zero, and in that case the two effects are individually zero! Whilst the Doppler effect results in an increased rate for $\beta < 0$ and a decreased rate for $\beta >0$, the phenomenon of time dilation always acts to slow the rate down. Then it just happens to be the case that for no choice of relative velocity can time dilation slow the rate down quite enough to counteract an increased rate due to the Doppler effect.

I've plotted the square root in the above formula below:

enter image description here

You can hopefully see that this function is always greater than 1 for $\beta$ less than zero, and always less than 1 for $\beta$ greater than zero. Hope this helps!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "for no choice of relative velocity" - how about sideways motion? For every magnitude of velocity there should be a direction (most likely unique up to radial symmentry) for which the doppler effect exactly counteracts the time dilation. Any idea what curve those velocity vectors form? $\endgroup$ – John Dvorak Mar 16 '15 at 9:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.