Localized field quanta? After the canonical quantization of the Klein-Gordon field (for example), we interpret the quantum of excitations of the fields with definite energy and momentum as particles. But our mental image of a particle is that of an entity which is localized at some point in space. But are they also localized in space? 
However, in quantum mechanics a particle is represented by a wavefunction. If it's not in a position eigenstate (dirac-delta function), and no measurement of position has been made on it, as I understand, position is not a defining attribute of a particle in quantum mechanics. The best representation of a particle with resonably well-known position is described by a wave-packet peaked about some point is space. This is possible only when we have made sure that the particle is trapped in a small finite region.
I've read in Ryder's book that "quantum field theory is a theory of point particles." Are the field quanta always point particles by construction or only under some controlled situations they behave as point particles with definite locations? If yes, how can we write such a state mathematically? In a nutshell, are the field quanta necessarily localized in space?
 A: To represent  the  states of a single particle in the $3$-space you should exploit the so called Newton-Wigner position representation. 
The point is that the so obtained wavefunction, for a KG field, is  a complex function defined in the rest space of the reference frame you are adopting and it  has a strongly non-local behavior under the action of Lorentz transformation. 
This is different from what happens for quantum fields that locally transform under Lorentz transformations.
Position-defined states are again formally represented by Dirac deltas in that representation.  If $\psi_{x_0}= \delta(x-x_0)$ is the wavefuntion of a KG particle in NW representation spatially localized at $x_0$ for $t=0$, the field configuration $\phi_{x_0}(t,x)$ associated to it is a solution of KG equation such that, for $t=0$, is localized around $x_0$ just up to the Compton length of the particle.
ADDENDUM
Let us focus on the momentum representation space for a real scalar KG particle with mass $m>0$. There are several, unitarily equivalent, possibilities to define that (one-particle) Hilbert space $\cal H$ used to build up the Fock space of the field. The most elementary one is thath referring to the standard measure $d^3p$ (instead of the covariant one $d^3p/E$). 
In this representation ${\cal H}= L^2({\mathbb R}^3, d^3p)$ and states are represented by normalized wavefunctions $\psi =\psi(\vec{p})$ belonging to that functional space. 
The momentum operator is therefore defined as (I adopt here the signature $-+++$ and $c=\hbar=1$):
$$\left(P^i \psi\right)(\vec{p}):= p^i \psi(\vec{p})\:, \quad \left(P^0 \psi\right)(\vec{p}):= E(\vec{p})\psi(\vec{p})=\sqrt{\vec{p}^2 +m^2}\psi(\vec{p})\:,\quad i=1,2,3\:,$$
for those wavefunctions such that the right-hand sides still are elements of $L^2(\mathbb R^3, d^3p)$. These operators are automatically self-adjoint and the $\mathbb R^3$ in  $L^2(\mathbb R^3, d^3p)$ turns out to coincide with the joint spectrum of $P_1,P_2,P_3$ as usual.
Let us come to the NW position operators and the corresponding representation of $\cal H$. In the Hilbert space $L^2(\mathbb R^3, d^3p)$, the three components of the three Newton-Wigner position operators are simply defined as the unique self-adjoint extensions of the symmetric operators:
$$\left(X^i\psi\right)(\vec{p}) := - i\frac{\partial}{\partial p^i}\psi(\vec{p})\qquad \psi \in C_0^\infty(\mathbb R^3)\:.$$
As usual, the (Newton-Wigner) position representation  is the representation of the formalism in an unitarily equivalent Hilbert space where the $X^i$s are multiplicative. So the $L^2$ space is the one constructed upon joint spectrum of these operators: $L^2(\mathbb R^3, d^3x)$. In practice, also introducing time evolution, the wavefunctions in this space are related with those in the momentum representation by the usual Fourier-Plancherel transform. For $\psi \in L^1(\mathbb R^3, d^3p)\cap L^2(\mathbb R^3, d^3p)$:
$$\phi_{NW}(t,\vec{x}):= \int_{\mathbb R^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{p}\cdot \vec{x}}}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} e^{-i tE(\vec{p})}\psi(\vec{p}) d^3p\:.$$
Conversely, the field representation is: 
$$\phi(t,\vec{x}):= \int_{\mathbb R^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{p}\cdot \vec{x}}}{(2\pi)^{3/2}\sqrt{2E(\vec{p})}} e^{-i tE(\vec{p})}\psi(\vec{p}) d^3p\:.$$
When acting on $\psi$ with the usual unitary action of the Lorentz group (henceforth $x= (t,\vec{x})$ and $p=(E(\vec{p}),\vec{p})$ are $4$-vectors and I define $E(p):= E(\vec{p})$), i.e.:
$$\left(U_\Lambda\psi\right)(\vec{p}) = \sqrt{\frac{E(p)}{E(\Lambda^{-1} p )}}\psi\left( \vec{\Lambda^{-1} p}\right) \:,$$
the field representation transforms locally
$$\phi \to \phi'\:,\quad \phi'(x):=\phi(\Lambda^{-1}x)\:,$$
whereas  the transformation law of the Newton-Wigner representation, $\phi_{NW}$, is given in terms of a quite complicated integral formula and the action turns out to be highly non-local, as the transformed $\phi'_{NW}(x)$ also depends on the values of the functions $\phi_{NW}(x)$ at events different for $x$ itself.
Finally, consider a particle localized at $\vec{x}_0$ for $t=0$. Therefore, at least formally, we can write:
$$\phi_{NW}(0,\vec{x}) = \delta(\vec{x}-\vec{x}_0)\:.$$
The covariant representation instead reads:
$$\phi(0,\vec{x}):= \int_{\mathbb R^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{p}\cdot (\vec{x}-\vec{x}_0)}}{(2\pi)^{3}\sqrt{2E(\vec{p})}} d^3p\:.$$
It is possible to prove that the shape of that function is concentrated in a set including $\vec{x}_0$ with linear extension of the order of $1/m$, namely the Compton length of the particle.
There is a wide, quite technical,  literature on these topics. Some results can be extended to QFT in curved spacetime for static spacetimes.  An elementary discussion in that context can be found in Fulling's textbook on QFT in curved spacetime. A general discussion though confined to  Minkowski spacetime, but even including fields with spin, appears in chapter 20 of Barut-Raczka's textbook on the theory of group representations. Several attempts to encompass a physically sensible notion of time observable  exists in the literature especially making use of POVM.
