What is meant by a local Lagrangian density? 
*

*What is meant by a local Lagrangian density? 

*How will a non-local Lagrangian look like? 

*What is the problem that we do not consider such Lagrangian densities?
 A: What is a local Lagrangian density?
A classical field theory on Minkowski space $\mathbb R^{d,1}$ is specified by a space $\mathcal C$ of field configurations $\phi:\mathbb R^{d,1}\to T$, and an action functional $S:\mathcal C\to\mathbb R$.  The set $T$ is called the target space of the theory, and is often a vector space.  If there exists a function $L:\mathcal C\times\mathbb R\to \mathbb R$ for which
\begin{align}
  S[\phi] = \int_{\mathbb R} dt\, L[\phi](t),
\end{align}
then we call $L$ a lagrangian for the theory.  If, further, there exists a function $\tilde L$ such that
\begin{align}
  L[\phi](t) = \int_{\mathbb R^d} d^d\mathbf x \,\tilde L[\phi](t, \mathbf x)
\end{align}
then we call $\tilde L$ a langrangian density for the theory.  Finally, if there exists a positive integer $n$ and a function $\mathscr L$ such that
\begin{align}
  \tilde L[\phi](t, \mathbf x) = \mathscr L(t,\mathbf x,\phi(t, \mathbf x), \partial\phi(t,\mathbf x), \dots, \partial^n\phi(t,\mathbf x))
\end{align}
then we say that the lagrangian density is local.  In other words, the lagrangian density is local provided its value at a given spacetime point depends only on that point, the value of the field at that point, and a finite number of its derivatives at that same point.
An example of a non-local Lagrangian density.
Consider $T = \mathbb R$, namely a theory of a single real scalar field.  Let $\mathbf a\in\mathbb R^d$ be given, and define a Lagrangian density by
\begin{align}
  \tilde L[\phi](t,\mathbf x) = \phi(t,\mathbf x) + \phi(t, \mathbf x+\mathbf a).
\end{align}
This Lagrangian density is not local because the value of the Lagrangian at a given point $(t,\mathbf x)$ depends on the value of the field at that point and on the value of the field at the point $(t,\mathbf x+\mathbf a)$.  If we were to Taylor expand the second term $\phi(t,\mathbf a)$ about $\mathbf x$, then we would see that the Lagrangian density depends on an infinite number of derivatives of the field, thus violating the definition of a local Lagrangian density.
What's the issue with theories with non-local Lagrangian densities?
I'm no expert on this, so I'll divert to another user.  I will say, however, that people do study theories with non-local Lagrangian densities in practice, so there's nothing a priori "wrong" with them, but they might generically exhibit some pathology that you might prefer not to have.
Perhaps most relevant, though, if you're taking QFT from a high energy theorist, for example, is that the Lagrangian density of the Standard Model is local, so there's no need to consider non-local beasts if one is studying the Standard Model.
