2
$\begingroup$

I am a physics enthusiast and I have a question: Why is it meaningless to express the '$\pm$' (standard deviation) value as a percentage?

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

Standard deviation adds uncertainties to the measured value: $23.3\pm 0.4\,{\rm m}$. One can quickly look at the error (which has units of ${\rm m}$ in my case) and think, The value could be as low as $22.9\,{\rm m}$ or as high as $23.7\,{\rm m}$ without much thinking. Modifying this to being a percentage of the value would be confusing.

Plus it would be arbitrary. As Martin Beckett points out, since the Celsius and Kelvin scales have identical temperature spacing but differing 0-points, making the error (std. dev.) scale to the value would be ridiculous: $$20.0\pm0.1\,{\rm C} \to 20.0\,{\rm C}\pm0.5\%$$ $$293.0\pm0.1\,{\rm K}\to293.0\,{\rm K}\pm0.034\%$$ Same value in units systems would lead to differing uncertainties; this would bring about more confusion.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Depends what you are measuring.

If you are measuring the temperature of a glass of water to 20C +- 0.1C what would the percentage be?

Now what would it be if you measured it as 293Kelvin +- 0.1K

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps, could you be more general? $\endgroup$ – quantumcrypto Jan 14 '14 at 2:35
  • $\begingroup$ He is telling that there are different units of measurements, and so the percentage in the error would vary. $\endgroup$ – user28355 Jan 14 '14 at 14:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.