The hole in the superconductor ought to be very small I believe. How the superconductor is cooled matters here as well. Essentially if you are a magnetic field line, you want to avoid diamagnets, avoid magnets in the wrong orientation and go towards magnets in the correct orientation.
If some large bulk superconductor is suddenly dropped in a field, even with a tiny hole in its center, its easier to go around it than just through it (to go through the hole requires the creation of super currents which takes some amount of energy).
If the superconductor is warm and in an existing field, and its cooled from the outside in then as it cools, the outer layers become diamagnetic expelling all magnetic fields and the inner hole still contains a field (which is easy to see since the region around here is not superconducting).
By the time the region around the center hole reaches the transition temperature, in order for these center magnetic field lines to leave the superconductor they need to basically drag across a massive diamagnetic bulk (very much not energetically favorable) so instead they don't move at all (just squeeze together to avoid the superconductor from all sides) and the supercondutor forms eddy currents to repel the material (I don't know for sure but I think the currents loop around the hole see here)
Now a different picture occurs if we cool the superconductor from left to right I believe. As the superconductor cools from its left side, all magnetic fields are expelled and as we go from left to right cooling everything in a line by the time we reach the center, the magnetic field lines can very easily just travel to the right (which is not superconducting yet) and so I suspect cooling this way will result in NO field lines in the center even though they were there originally.
It seems in your professors diagram, given we don't specify HOW the cooling occurs, the assumption is the entire superconductor suddenly transitions.