5
$\begingroup$

I have a particle and a potential $$V(x)=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}k\delta(x),$$

where $\delta (x)$ is the Delta function, and I am interested in the solutions of the stationary Schroedinger equation.

If $\psi_1$ is the solution for $x<0$ and $\psi_2$ for $x>0$, I must have $\psi_1'(0) \neq \psi_2'(0)$, because of the delta function.

Now I read that the condition is $$\psi_2'(0) -\psi_1'(0) = -k\psi_2(0).$$

My question is: why? How do I get to this conclusion?

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

With a delta function potential, the particle is free on either side of the barrier: $$ \psi(x)=\begin{cases}\psi_L(x)=A_re^{ikx}+A_le^{-ikx} \\ \psi_R(x)=B_re^{ikx}+B_le^{-ikx}\end{cases} $$ where $A_i,\,B_i$ are constants such that $A_r+A_l=B_r+B_l$ (i.e., $\psi(x)$ satisfies the continuous function condition).

But at the barrier we have the issue that $V(0)=\infty$. So to resolve this issue, we use Schroedinger's equation and integrate it over some small region $\left[-\epsilon,\,\epsilon\right]$ and then let $\epsilon\to0$: $$ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon\psi''\,dx+\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon V\psi\,dx=E\int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon\psi\,dx $$ The first term is clearly $d\psi/dx$ evaluated at two points. The last term goes to zero in the limit $\epsilon\to0$ (recall that $E$ is constant and finite, so that as $\epsilon\to0$, the width goes to 0 and so does the whole value).

For the potential term, the delta function has the great property that $$ \int\delta(x-a)f(x)\,dx=f(a) $$ Thus, that middle term becomes $\left.\psi(x)\right|_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon$. We then combine these two to get $$ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left[\psi'\left(+\epsilon\right)-\psi'(-\epsilon)\right]+\left.\lambda\psi(x)\right|_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}=0 $$ As $\epsilon\to0$, we can get the relation you are confused over: $$ \psi'_R(0)-\psi'_L(0)=+k\psi(0) $$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Shouldn't that be $\psi'_R\left(0\right) - \psi'_L\left(0\right) = + k \psi\left(0\right)$? $\endgroup$ – Eric Angle Jan 3 '14 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ @EricAngle: Good catch. Fixed. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jan 3 '14 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ @EricAngle: Gah! Caught again! I blame it on the lack of sleep (had to comfort my son who was dreaming of being chased by dinosaurs last night). $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jan 3 '14 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, I deleted my second comment (about it being $+k \psi\left(0\right)$ on the right hand side) because I saw you change it shortly thereafter. I understand wrt sleepless nights. :) $\endgroup$ – Eric Angle Jan 3 '14 at 17:47
2
$\begingroup$

See this, beginning at "A second relation can be found by studying the derivative of the wavefunction." For your problem, $\lambda = \hbar^2 k / 2 m$.

The idea is to integrate the Schrödinger equation over the interval $\left(-\epsilon, \epsilon\right)$ and let $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I always forget to look carefully in the English Wikipedia. In Italian there are many fewer pages. $\endgroup$ – Charlie Jan 3 '14 at 22:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.