It it known that the massive spin-2 irreducible representation of the Poincare group is the traceless symmetrical transverse 4-tensor $h_{\mu \nu}$ with rank 2: $$ (\partial^{2} + m^{2})h_{\mu \nu} = 0, \quad \partial_{\mu}h^{\mu \nu} = 0, \quad h = 0. $$ These conditions may be united into one equation: $$ \partial_{\mu }\partial_{\nu}h - g_{\mu \nu}(\partial^{2} + m^{2})h - (\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\alpha }h_{\alpha \nu} + \partial_{\nu}\partial^{\alpha }h_{\alpha \mu}) + \eta_{\mu \nu}\partial^{\alpha} \partial^{\beta}h_{\alpha \beta} + (\partial^{2} + m^{2})h_{\mu \nu} $$ $$= 0, \tag{1} $$ which is called Pauli-Fierz equation.

Also there is the linearized gravity $g_{\mu \nu} = \eta_{\mu \nu} + h_{\mu \nu}$, and Einstein equations for $h_{\mu \nu}$ takes the form $$ \partial^{2}h_{\nu \sigma} - (\partial_{\nu}\partial^{\alpha}h_{\alpha \sigma} + \partial_{\sigma}\partial^{\alpha}h_{\alpha \nu} ) + (\eta_{\nu \sigma}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\alpha}h^{\mu \alpha} + \partial_{\nu} \partial_{\sigma}h) - \eta_{\nu \sigma}\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}h = - \Lambda T_{\nu \sigma}, $$ which is absolutely equal to $(1)$if $m = 0 $ and $T_{\nu \sigma} = 0$ (the second condition refers to the free field).

So I have the question: can I simply set $m$ in $(1)$ to zero? Does it automatically reduce the number of degrees of freedom (by the number of spin projection values) of massive spin-2 field to the number of degrees of freedom (by the number of helicity projection values) of massless spin-2 field?

  • $\begingroup$ Could you check your equation (1)? As it is, it has two identical terms in second parenthesis. $\endgroup$ – user23660 Dec 29 '13 at 5:14
  • $\begingroup$ @user23660 : yes, you're right, thank you. I rewrote it. $\endgroup$ – Andrew McAddams Dec 29 '13 at 10:54

Yes, you can simply set $m=0$ in the Fierz-Pauli equation (if it is written correctly :) ). The only thing to remember is that at $m=0$ it becomes gauge invariant under $\delta h_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu\xi_\nu+\partial_\nu\xi_\mu$. It is this gauge invariance that reduces properly the number of degrees of freedom. From the gravity point of view the gauge invariance is nothing but linearized diffeomorphisms.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.