0
$\begingroup$

I've seen plans for a pendulum oscillator water pump that is claimed to pump a large volume of water (100 gallons) from a well of 100 feet deep. The pendulum consists of a 100 pound weight raised 6 feet. A second 20 pound weight is hoisted up a pole 20 feet high. This second weight powers a mechanism which gives the pendulum a very slight push on every swing so that it does not lose any momentum on any stroke. The only energy inputs into this system are the act of raising the 20 pound weight 20 feet and raising the 100 pound weight 6 feet. This is supposed to pump 100 gallons (833 pounds of water) up 100 feet.

It seems to me that this is impossible, because we have applied a given amount of potential energy into this system: 20lbs x 20feet = 400 foot pounds 100lbs x 6 feet = 600 foot pounds So 1000 foot pounds total

So this should be capable (at best) of raising 10 pounds of water (1.2 gallons) up 100 feet.

I've been told that I don't understand the engineering principles of oscillation, and I've been assured that the math checks out. However, based on the very limited physics I know (and I admittedly don't know much) - you can't get more work out of a system than you put in.

How is it possible to get more energy out of a system than you put into it?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are these reassuring statements accompanied by any requests for funding? $\endgroup$ – DJohnM Dec 27 '13 at 21:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How is it possible to get more energy out of a system than you put into it? You can't. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Dec 27 '13 at 21:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are many "over unity" ideas found online. If they worked, they would be rich. If they bent or violate laws of physics, they would be rich & famous. "The proof is in the pudding". $\endgroup$ – Optionparty Dec 27 '13 at 22:51
  • $\begingroup$ "The proof of the pudding is in the eating". $\endgroup$ – DWin Dec 27 '13 at 23:55
1
$\begingroup$

Based on what you wrote, I cannot understand how such a machine even is remotely close to doing anything at all.

As for getting more energy out of a system than you put in... This violates energy conservation (or more fundamentally, time translation symmetry) which is an assumption that has never been observed to be violated and is the foundation for many of our theories that have centuries of experimental proof. Nothing is guaranteed, but it is highly unlikely such a machine is possible.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.