The vanilla description of stimulated emission (e.g. in the context of an inverted population laser gain medium) says that a photon with some state vector specifying its energy / polarization / direction / etc. will approach an atom or molecule in an excited state, and (via induction of a dipole?) induce the production of a second photon with the same state vector (i.e. the same energy / polarization / direction / etc.). Ignoring anything exotic, like two- or multiphoton emission, if the emitted photon has some energy $\Delta E$, then the atom in the excited state must have a ground state or other eigenstate $\approx \Delta E$ below the excited state's energy range (which, for example, makes stimulated emission in some materials more efficient or higher yield than in others).

Taken to the extreme, this statement seems to become ridiculous, since it implies that the atom or molecule interacting with the EM field of the incident photon can somehow perfectly measure the components of this photon's state vector. So I suppose we can modify the statement to say that this measurement can be performed with an accuracy given by Heisenberg's uncertainty relation. But is the distribution for the difference in energy / direction / polarization actually much broader than this? How can we characterize it?

  • $\begingroup$ your question is a great one: for now have a look at sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/stimem.htm $\endgroup$ – WetSavannaAnimal Dec 23 '13 at 14:08
  • $\begingroup$ @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance Thanks for the link. And actually it occurs to me just now where the concept of a tractor beam comes from in science fiction. $\endgroup$ – RGrey Dec 23 '13 at 14:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance So that comment sounds less ridiculous, I mean that the recoil associated with emitting a photon should push a particle in the direction of the source of photons mediating stimulated emission. $\endgroup$ – RGrey Dec 23 '13 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ No, actually I knew what you meant straight away. It is at first glance weird that the atom recoils against the momentum of the stimulating radiation. However, it would only work as a "tractor beam" for atoms in raised states, and then only once. It could well have been the inspiration for the sci fi concept. $\endgroup$ – WetSavannaAnimal Dec 24 '13 at 8:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.