$g\phi^3$ , $d=4$ , 3 point One loop diagram (three external legs) Divergence

I am trying to find where the divergence factor/pole is on the following diagram in 4 dimensions so that I can use minimal subtraction...

enter image description here

I know it is proportional to...

$$ \int d^dy_1 \ d^dy_2 \ d^dy_3 \ D_f(x_1,y_1)D_f(x_2,y_2)D_f(x_3,y_3)D_f(y_1,y_2)D_f(y_2,y_3) D_f(y_3,y_1)$$

where $D_f$ are Feynmann propagators. Which I can manipulate to get... $$ \int d^dp_1 \cdots d^dp_3 \left(\frac{\textrm{Exp}[ip_1x_1]}{p_1^2+m^2}\right) \cdots \left(\frac{\textrm{Exp}[ip_3x_3]}{p_3^2+m^2}\right) \delta[p_1+p_2+p_3] \bullet \int d^dp_4 \left(\frac{1}{p_4^2+m^2}\right) \left(\frac{1}{(p_2+p_4)^2+m^2}\right) \left(\frac{1}{(p_2+p_3+p_4)^2+m^2}\right) $$

Which looks like a renormalization to the coupling constant $g$. So I only mess around with the $p_4$ integral, however it seems to be finite (no divergences) when I use Feynmanns trick... $$ \frac{1}{abc}=2 \int_0^1 dx \int^{1-x}_0 dy \ (ax+by+c(1-x-y))^{-3} $$ and the following integral... $$ \int \frac{d^dp}{(p^2+2p \cdot q +m^2)^n} \textrm{(Minkowski)} = i \pi^{d/2}(m^2-q^2)^{d/2-n} \frac{\Gamma[n-d/2] \Gamma[d/2]}{\Gamma[n]} $$

Was just wondering if I am going in the right direction or if I did something wrong.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @David Z can it be considered for reopening? I mean its not so trivial homework problem, and the OP has also shown some effort $\endgroup$ – user10001 Dec 9 '13 at 17:49
  • $\begingroup$ That seems correct. You have to perform the integration on $x$ and $y$ to get the Feynmann diagram result (as a function of $p_2,p_3,m$). Now, the convergence will depends on $d$... $\endgroup$ – Trimok Dec 9 '13 at 20:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @David Z (Comment 2, after 21 hours) I am still waiting for any response from you. Can this question be considered for reopening ? $\endgroup$ – user10001 Dec 10 '13 at 15:33
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You have 3 propagators, so the denominator of your loop momentum goes like $\frac{1}{k^6}$ dimensionally, while you're in 4 dimensions so you have $\int\; dk \, k^3$. The field is not massless and you needn't worry about IR divergences. So what do you think about the UV behaviour of the loop integral? $\endgroup$ – Siva Dec 23 '13 at 3:06

In $d=4$ and $n=3$, you the following relation $w = 4 - E - V$, where:

  • $w=$ supercifial degree of divergence
  • $E=$ external legs
  • $V=$ number of vertices

So, if you replace the values of $d$ and $n$, you will get $w<0$, therefore you won't have $UV$ divergences in that diagram.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to Physics.SE, Noel! We usually use MathJaX to render (even small) formulae prettier than in plaintext. Otherwise, have fun! $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Aug 15 '14 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ Following up on ACuriousMind's comment, I've edited in some nicer formatting. Click the edit link to see the markup behind this (once you get a bit of rep you can do this with any post to see how it was formatted). $\endgroup$ – Kyle Oman Aug 15 '14 at 19:16
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry about the late reply and thanks for the answer! $\endgroup$ – Ben Nov 11 '14 at 15:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.