I have a problem where, basically, in part (a) I correctly found a fundamental equation $$TdS = dE - 2\sigma l dx$$

Then the problem goes on to say that the only parameters of interest are $x$ and $T$, so I would assume we can write the relation $$dS = \frac{\partial S}{\partial x} dx + \frac{\partial S}{\partial T}dT$$ by taking the total derivative. From this information, the solution goes on to say "We can read off the Maxwell relation $$\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x}\right)_T = \left(\frac{\partial(-2\sigma l)}{\partial T}\right)_x = -2l \frac{d \sigma}{dT} \qquad \sigma = \sigma_0 - \alpha T$$

Where $\sigma$ is given in the problem statement. I'm just not seeing where they find this maxwell relation....been stuck for quite some time. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The maxwell relation you wrote implies a potential, we'll call it $M$, that has differential $dM = S dT - 2\sigma l dx$. $\endgroup$ – lionelbrits Dec 1 '13 at 20:06

I'll elaborate on my comment. Maxwell's relations are just observations that second partial derivatives of a function commute. So for some potential $\Phi(x,y)$, if you differentiate, $d\Phi = (\partial_x \Phi) dx + (\partial_y \Phi) dy$, then because second partial derivatives commute, i.e., $\partial_y \partial_x \Phi = \partial_x \partial_y \Phi$, we obtain an identity on the coefficients of $dx$ and $dy$ in $d\Phi$.

The Maxwell relation that the solution gives you is reminiscent of a potential $A$ that has differential

$dA = -S dT + 2 \sigma l dx$,

because if $\partial_T A = -S$ and $\partial_x A = 2\sigma l$, then $\partial_T \partial_x A = \partial_x A \partial_T A$ reproduces your identity.

Now, I am going about the problem from the wrong end, because I am given the solution and asked to find how to derive it. However, my suspicion is that you are supposed to recognize from the start that $dx$ looks like a change in volume term ($dV$) and $-2 \sigma l$ a measure of pressure ($P$). Once you have done this, you have many Maxwell relations at your disposal. The mathematics don't care about the exact form of $P dV$, in other words.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.