6
$\begingroup$

The invariance under translation leads to the conserved energy-momentum tensor $\Theta_{\mu\nu}$ satisfying $\partial^\mu\Theta_{\mu\nu}=0$, from which we get the conserved quantity$$P^\nu=\int d^3\mathbf x\Theta^{0\nu}(x)$$But I cannot see explicitly how this quantity is a four-vector covariant under Lorentz transformation, since $d^3\mathbf x$ is part of the invariant $d^4x$, $\Theta^{0\nu}(x)$ is part of the covariant tensor $\Theta^{\mu\nu}(x)$, neither of which transforms covariantly.

So can someone show me how this becomes correct?

And generally, how to show that a Noether charge $Q$ corresponding to the Noether current $j^\mu$, $$Q=\int d^3\mathbf x j^0(x)$$ , is a Lorentz scalar?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Weinberg, gravitation and cosmology, p40-41 $\endgroup$ – user26143 Nov 21 '13 at 6:50
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much @user26143, that really solved my problem! $\endgroup$ – LYg Nov 21 '13 at 22:03
1
$\begingroup$

You may use the following notation for hypersurfaces in four dimensions :

$d\sigma_\mu = \epsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma}dx^\alpha dx^\beta dx^\gamma$

For instance $d\sigma_0= d^3x$

The expression of the momentum-energy is then :

$P_\nu = \int d\sigma^\mu \Theta_{\mu\nu}$

The same kind of expression could be used with the charge :

$Q = \int d\sigma^\mu j_{\mu}$

[EDIT]

How make the connection with the OP formulae ?

One may adopt the following point of view, take for instance the formula for the charge $\tilde Q = \int d\sigma^\mu j_{\mu}$, this means :

$ \tilde Q = \int d\sigma^0 j_{0} + \int d\sigma^1 j_{1} + \int d\sigma^2 j_{2}+ \int d\sigma^3 j_{3} \\ =\int dx~ dy~ dz ~j_{0}+\int dy~ dz~ dt ~j_{1}+\int dz~ dt~ dx ~j_{2} + \int dt~ dx~ dy ~j_{3} \\=Q + \int dy~ dz~ dt ~j_{1}+\int dz~ dt~ dx ~j_{2} + \int dt~ dx~ dy ~j_{3}$

Now, take one of the residual integrals, for instance $I_1=\int dy~ dz~ dt ~j_{1}$, it is an integral at $x$ constant, and one may choose $x=\pm\infty$. At infinity, we may suppose that the current is zero : $j_1(\pm \infty)=0$. So, assuming a zero current $j_1$ at spatial $x$ infinity, we get $I_1=0$, and one may have the same demonstration for the other 2 integrals.

So, finally , with the hypothesis of taking spatial slicing of the residual integrals at spatial infinity, and vanishing currents at spatial infinity, we have $\tilde Q = Q$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But I couldn't see how your definition $P_\nu=\int d\sigma^\mu\Theta_{\mu\nu}$ coincides with $P_\nu=\int d^3\mathbf x\Theta_{0\nu}=\int d\sigma^0\Theta_{0\nu}$, respects $\endgroup$ – LYg Nov 22 '13 at 1:00
  • $\begingroup$ @LYg : I edited the answer. $\endgroup$ – Trimok Nov 22 '13 at 10:50
  • $\begingroup$ However, what if you haven't chosen $x=\pm\infty$, do you mean $I_1=\int dy~ dz~ dt ~j_{1}$ is independent of $x$ ? but can you show this, seeing $j_i$ only vanishes at spatial infinity, not at time infinity, so that you cannot say $I_1$ is independent of $x$ due to vanishing space-time surface by Gauss's law. $\endgroup$ – LYg Nov 22 '13 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.