If I look at Hooke's law as it's defined in my textbook, it looks like:

$F = -k\Delta s$

Therefore, the restoring force of an ideal spring will be proportional to the displacement from equilibrium, where $k$ will be the constant of proportionality. From this equation, I believe that it can't be said that mass is proportional to the displacement from equilibrium (even though it seems to be the case implicitly).

However, if I substitute $ma$ for the restoring force:

$ma = -k\Delta s$

Is it then valid to say that mass is proportional to the displacement from equilibrium, as well as mass is inversely proportional to acceleration? I've been thinking about proportionality a lot lately and this one sort of threw me for a loop.


2 Answers 2


In a sense yes, if you're very careful about what you're holding constant. Stating that a variable is proportional to another variable implies that all other relevant quantities are being held constant.

For example, there's a simple relation $d=vt$ that describes the distance $d$ something travels in a time $t$ when traveling at speed $v$. One might say that $d$ is proportional to $t$. However, this relation is only valid if the speed $v$ is constant throughout the interval $t.$

In your example, one could say that mass is proportional to displacement if the $k$ and $a$ are constant, but you will need to do some work to figure out what physical system(s) meet such requirements.

  • $\begingroup$ All of my confusion disappeared after reading this post. Thanks a lot! $\endgroup$
    – user32297
    Nov 13, 2013 at 5:16

You have to be a little careful to make sure you're clear on what you're modeling when you combine various equations together.

If you are thinking of a mass attached to a spring attached to the ceiling, then yes, the mass is proportional to the spring displacement. This follows since in the case of an object being acted on by gravity, $a=g$, and thus $|\Delta s|=mg/k$. This should make intuitive sense; if you hang a heavier weight, it should stretch more and hang lower.

In general, however, the exact form of $a$ is not specified in the question, so to make any sound statements you'll need more info on what the system you have in mind is.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.