1
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to evaluate the magnetic field by calculating the Coloumb integral $\overrightarrow{A}$, and later I will take: $$\overrightarrow{B}=\nabla \times \overrightarrow{A}$$

However, in the middle of everything, I get to (cylindrical coordinates):

$$\overrightarrow{A}=\frac{\mu_oI}{4\pi} \oint_{C} \frac{a\hat{\phi'}}{[r²+(z-b)^2-2ar\cos(\phi-\phi')]^{1/2}} d\phi'$$

I should show that the only component of this expression is $\hat{\phi}$, where:

$$\hat{r'}=\hat{x}\cos{\phi'}+\hat{y}\sin{\phi}$$ $$\hat{\phi'}=-\hat{x}\sin{\phi'}+\hat{y}\cos{\phi'}$$ $$\hat{r}=\hat{x}\cos{\phi}+\hat{y}\sin{\phi}$$ $$\hat{\phi}=-\hat{x}\sin{\phi}+\hat{y}\cos{\phi}$$

and that it's leading to only this integral:

$$\overrightarrow{A}=\frac{\mu_oI}{4\pi} \oint_{C} \frac{a\cos{\left(\phi-\phi'\right)}\hat{\phi}}{[r²+(z-b)^2-2ar\cos(\phi-\phi')]^{1/2}} d\phi'$$

But when I rewrite how $\hat{\phi'}$ relates to $\hat{\phi}$ and $\hat{r}$, it's not so obvious that the $\hat{r}$ component disappears. The writer refers to symmetry, but I can't still figure this out. So I basically have this integral instead because I can't show how the $\hat{r}$ component is zero:

$$\overrightarrow{A}=\frac{\mu_oI}{4\pi} \oint_{C} \frac{a\sin{\left(\phi-\phi'\right)}\hat{r}+a\cos{\left(\phi-\phi'\right)}\hat{\phi}}{[r²+(z-b)^2-2ar\cos(\phi-\phi')]^{1/2}} d\phi'$$ Any ideas? I've been stuck at this for a while, and I've tried to show it in Cartesian coordinates without no luck.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Hint: substitute $u=\cos{(\phi - \phi')}$ and integrate.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Before starting to calculate; does that help to show the $\hat{r}$ component is zero? $\endgroup$
    – Curtain
    Nov 10 '13 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ @JulianAssange yes, that should become obvious after you substitute the cosine term back in to evaluate the limits of integration. $\endgroup$
    – David H
    Nov 10 '13 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @David H, that worked. However, can you somehow see any symmetry to refer to? I can't, so I wonder what symmetry the writer sees. $\endgroup$
    – Curtain
    Nov 10 '13 at 17:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.