0
$\begingroup$

I have the feeling that there is a direct relationship between the distance in Hilbert space and the fidelity (similarity) between quantum states.

  1. short version : the distance between two quantum states and is defined as the norm of their difference vector: d(ψ,ϕ)=∥ψ−ϕ∥=⟨ψ−ϕ∣ψ−ϕ⟩​

Now, as far as I undertstand, this norm/ distance in Hilbert space is a measure of how different two quantum states are, with fidelity providing a direct way to quantify their similarity.Higher fidelity thus indicates greater similarity between states, resulting in a smaller distance ; while lower fidelity (typically, with orthogonal states) indicates greater dissimilarity, resulting in a larger distance. Would you agree with that ?

  1. Long version -- or an attempt to make a rigorous connection between the distance in Hilbert space and the notion of fidelity. At least, for pure states.

Let's take to pure states $$(\psi) and (\phi)$$ The fidelity is given by the absolute value of the inner product: $$ F(\psi, \phi) = |\langle \psi | \phi \rangle| $$

Now, the distance between the states is the norm of their difference: $$ d(\psi, \phi) = \|\psi - \phi\| = \sqrt{\langle \psi - \phi | \psi - \phi \rangle} $$

The, using the properties of inner products, we can expand the norm: $$ \|\psi - \phi\|^2 = \langle \psi - \phi | \psi - \phi \rangle = \langle \psi | \psi \rangle + \langle \phi | \phi \rangle - \langle \psi | \phi \rangle - \langle \phi | \psi \rangle $$

  • For normalized states $$(psi\| = \|\phi\| = 1)$$: $$ \|\psi - \phi\|^2 = 2 - 2 \text{Re}(\langle \psi | \phi \rangle) $$ And since $$(\psi | \phi)$$ is a complex number, $$(\text{Re}(\langle \psi | \phi \rangle) \leq |\langle \psi | \phi \rangle|)$$: $$ \|\psi - \phi\|^2 = 2 - 2 |\langle \psi | \phi \rangle| = 2(1 - F(\psi, \phi)) $$ Therefore: $$ d(\psi, \phi) = \sqrt{2(1 - F(\psi, \phi))} $$

For pure states, the distance in Hilbert space is directly related to fidelity through the formula $$(d(\psi, \phi) = \sqrt{2(1 - F(\psi, \phi))})$$.

Again, what do you think of that ?

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What do you think of that? That question is too vague, and check-my-work questions are off-topic. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Nov 9 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ OK then. As for the short version ? It's basically the same question $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 9 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it is. Would-you-agree = check-my-work. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Nov 9 at 22:30
  • $\begingroup$ But there's.no work there. I'm just asking about the connection between fidelity (as a measure of overlap between the state) and distance in Hiberr state (As a measure of dissimilarity-- at least, I think it is !) $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 9 at 22:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What exactly is the question? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 10 at 3:38

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The connection between Fidelity and the Trace distance, defined as

$$ D(\rho,\sigma) = \frac 12 \operatorname{tr}(|\rho-\sigma|) $$

Is well known in literature. Check, for example, Nielsen, Michael A., and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information Chapter 9 section 2.3. pg 415-416. The bound you found is generalized to

$$ 1-F(\rho,\sigma)\leq D(\rho,\sigma)\leq \sqrt{1-F(\rho,\sigma)^2} $$

Which is proved first time in this article by Fuchs and van de Graaf.

There is a related question in other stack about to saturate this inequality here.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! I thought I saw this connection with the notion of trace, which I need to think about. Nevertheless, is it really the same notion of distance as that implied in my question? I was talking about the Hilbert distance (sometimes called the Hilbert-Schmidt distance, I think?), defined by the norm, and not the ‘trace norm’... $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 11 at 0:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.