So I have a steady isothermal flow of an ideal gas through a smooth duct (no frictional losses) and need to compute the mass flow rate (per unit area) as a function of pressures at any two different arbitrary points, say 1 and 2. I have the following momentum equation in differential form:

\begin{equation} \rho vdv + dP = 0\end{equation} where $v$ is the gas the flow velocity and $P$ is static pressure. The mass flow rate per unit cross section $G$, can be calculated by integrating this equation between points 1 and 2. This is where it gets confusing. I do the integration by two ways:

1) Use the ideal gas equation $P = \rho RT$ right away and restructure the momentum equation: \begin{equation} vdv + RT\frac{dP}{P} = 0\end{equation}, integrate it between points 1 and 2 and arrive at:

\begin{equation} v_1^2-v_2^2 + 2RTln\frac{P_1}{P_2} = 0 \end{equation}

Since the flow is steady, I can write $G = \rho_1 v_1 = \rho_2 v_2$, again use the ideal gas law to write density in terms of gas pressure and finally arrive at the mass flow rate expression:

\begin{equation} G^2 = \frac{2ln\frac{P_2}{P_1}}{RT(\frac{1}{P_1^2}-\frac{1}{P_2^2})} \end{equation}

2) In another way of integrating (which is mathematically correct), I start by multiplying the original momentum equation by $\rho$ to get

\begin{equation} \rho^2 vdv + \frac{1}{RT}PdP = 0\end{equation} write $\rho^2v = G^2/v$, integrate between points 1 and 2 to arrive at

\begin{equation} G^2ln\frac{v_2}{v_1} = \frac{P_1^2 - P_2^2}{2RT} \end{equation} Using the ideal gas law the velocity ratio can be written as the pressure ratio to finally arrive at the mass flow rate equation

\begin{equation} G^2 = \frac{P_1^2 - P_2^2}{2RTln\frac{P_1}{P_2}} \end{equation}

Both the expressions are dimensionaly sound and I know that the second expression is the correct one. My question is, whats wrong with first expression.

  • $\begingroup$ I think your mistake is here.. $$P = \rho RT$$ $$ vdv + RT\frac{dP}{P} = 0$$ This does not look like the momentum equation for ideal gas $\endgroup$ – mcodesmart Oct 30 '13 at 21:06
  • $\begingroup$ Divide the momentum equation by $\rho$ and use ideal gas law... $\endgroup$ – nole Oct 30 '13 at 21:33
  • $\begingroup$ what I mean by that is $v_2/v_1 = \rho_1/\rho_2 = P_1/P_2$. The velocity-density relation comes from the conservation of mass, while density-pressure relation comes from the ideal gas law $P = \rho RT$ $\endgroup$ – nole Oct 31 '13 at 1:16
  • $\begingroup$ in fact, there are infinite ways to arrive at different solutions. Just multiply by a higher power on $\rho$ each time and integrate the equation. Mathematically this is possible but this has to have only one physically correct solution. $\endgroup$ – nole Oct 31 '13 at 1:39
  • $\begingroup$ How do you know that the second one is the correct one? $\endgroup$ – SimpleLikeAnEgg Oct 31 '13 at 6:34

The reason why you arrive at different solutions is that the assumptions in the assignment are inconsistent. One way to show this is to show in isothermal flow if ideal gas in straight duct of constant cross-section with no friction the gas has to have the same pressure everywhere; different pressures at the entrance and the exit $P_1, P_2$ are not possible.

To show this, let us take the Euler equation

$$\ \rho v \frac{dv}{dx} + \frac{dp}{dx} = 0, $$

and transform it into equation for $P(x)$ only. We express $v$ as $G/\rho$ and obtain

$$ \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{G^2}{\rho}\right) + \frac{dP}{dx} = 0. $$ From the state equation of ideal gas, we can express the density as a function of pressure and temperature:

$$ \rho = \frac{MP}{RT}, $$ where $M$ is molar mass of the gas and $R$ is the universal gas constant. Replacing $\rho$ in the last equation, we obtain

$$ \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{G^2 RT}{M} \frac{1}{P(x)} + P(x)\right) = 0. $$

Since the temperature $T$ is assumed constant, this equation implies that the pressure $P$ is constant as well, which contradicts the assumption about different pressures $P_1, P_2$.

In other words, if there is no friction, the gas will move inertially with the same pressure and velocity everywhere. The velocity can be any number so it cannot be deduced from the data in the assignment.

The assignment may have reasonable solution if we introduce friction into the model. The mathematically simplest way seems to be to add a negative constant force to the right-hand side of the Euler equation:

$$ \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{G^2 RT}{M} \frac{1}{P(x)} + P(x)\right) = -f. $$ This equation has sensible solution $P(x)$ for given pressures $P_1, P_2$ and will allow you to find $G$ and $v(x)$. However, physically constant friction is rather unrealistic model, especially if the friction is low, as then the gas velocity and its transversal gradient will increase rapidly along the duct. Since the Newton friction forces are proportional to transversal gradient, they should get stronger along the duct and thus damp the increase in velocity (but not completely, in reality the velocity should increase along the duct). More realistic approach would be to solve the Navier-Stokes equations for stationary isothermal flow, similarly to what one does in the derivation of the Poiseuille law for incompressible liquid flow in a pipe.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Apart from the physical meaning i think that there is a mathematics issue here. When you divide the original differential equation you result in an equivalent form. But when you have a condition related to the variables then things change and essentially you generate a different equation and thus different solution.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Have a look into Rayleigh line flow (Flow with heat addition or loss). I just spent some time refreshing my memory by reading a chapter from "Gas Dynamics" by James E. A. John. That book has a very good introduction to the topic. At a glance, Wikipedia seems to have a decent looking page on it as well. The discussion of Rayleigh line flow from these two sources is for perfect gases only. I suspect that some very interesting things might be possible for other equations of state. A key result for perfect gases, where the speed of sound $a = \sqrt{\gamma R T}$, is that temperature and Mach number (likewise speed and temperature since the speed of sound is only a function of temperature) $M = v/a$, are related by $$T=\frac{M^2}{(1+\gamma M^2)^2}\times constant$$ For a fixed temperature you can only hope to satisfy this equation with at most two Mach numbers (2nd order polynomial equation in $M^2$ with $M>0$ required). Which Rayleigh line we are dealing with all depends on the downstream and upstream pressure conditions that set up the flow. Consequently, the only valid isothermal solution for a perfect gas is $$v_1=v_2$$ $$P_1=P_2$$ $$\rho_1=\rho_2$$ $$\dot{Q}=0$$ where $\dot{Q}$ is the heat flux. I believe this is probably why you are able to find an unlimited number of what appear to be valid solutions to the problem, all of which satisfy the only real solution.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ the 1/2 factor in KE term of the momentum equation was missing, hence I added that. Nonetheless, the momentum equation you derived can be simplified to: \begin{equation} \frac{dP}{P} + \frac{2v dv}{v^2 + 2RT} = 0 \end{equation}. Integrating this even does not yield the correct expression for mass flow rate $\endgroup$ – nole Oct 31 '13 at 2:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you referring to $\rho v^2$ in the $$d(\rho v^2+P)=0$$ as a KE term? It's not a KE term so you don't need the 1/2. It is the rate of momentum flux. $\endgroup$ – SimpleLikeAnEgg Oct 31 '13 at 3:36
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry, my misunderstanding it doesn't need that 1/2 factor. But does the expression you derive match the expected answer? $\endgroup$ – nole Oct 31 '13 at 3:38
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you have an interesting question going... I will look through my gas dynamics books to see what I can find. $\endgroup$ – SimpleLikeAnEgg Oct 31 '13 at 3:44
  • $\begingroup$ @SimpleLikeAnEgg: Constant pressure and velocity along the duct is the right result if there is no friction. But I do not understand how you arrived at it - the relation between the gas velocity (Mach number) and temperature makes no sense. If the motion of the gas is inertial (velocity is constant, no friction present), the gas can move with any velocity. $\endgroup$ – Ján Lalinský Nov 28 '13 at 0:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.