3
$\begingroup$

I am self studying QFT on the book "A modern introduction to quantum field theory" by Maggiore and I am reading the chapter about the Dyson series (chapter 5.3).

It states the following equation for the time-evolution of the field $\phi(t,\vec{x})$:

$$\phi(t,\vec{x}) = e^{iH\tau}\phi(t_0,\vec{x})e^{-iH\tau}\tag{5.49}$$

where $\tau=(t-t_0)$, and $H = H_0 + H_{int}$.

Then I guess it assumes that $e^{-iH(t-t_0)}$ is the time-evolution operator.

However, as far as I know from QM this is valid only if $H$ doesn't depend on $t$, but this doesn't seem to be true, since $H$ depends directly or indirectly on the 4-vector $x$.

So I looked to the same subject in the book "Quantum field theory and the standard model" by Schwartz and he states that the time-evolution operator satisfy the following equation (page 84 "Hamiltonian derivation")

$$i\partial_t S(t,t_0) = H(t_0)S(t,t_0).\tag{7.28}$$

Note that it's $H(t_0)$, not $H(t)$, and then the equation has the solution:

$$S(t,t_0) = e^{-iH(t_0)(t-t_0)}$$

which is different from the previous one, $e^{-iH(t-t_0)}$, from Maggiore book.

So I am really confused about what is in QFT the time-evolution operator, and if in that formula $H$ depends on $t$.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
7
$\begingroup$

Maggiore is assuming there that the field interacts with itself or with other fields in a stationary way. In other words, there is no direct appearance of time in the total Hamiltonian.

This is a quite fair hypothesis (homogeneity of time) when describing evolution of closed systems in an inertial reference frame.

In this case the total Hamiltonian operator $$H = \int_\Sigma :\hat{T}_{00}(x): d^3x$$ is a constant of motion, that is $H$ is time-indipendent, if $T_{\mu\nu}$ includes the contributions of all parts of the system, assuming that the total system is isolated.

Schwartz instead considers a case where there is also an external system $S'$ whose evolution is given and that interacts with the studied system $S$.

Here time in the Hamiltonian of $S$ shows up due to the external system.

This situation is typical in the case of a quantum field or a quantum system in external background. The price to pay is that, looking at $S$ only, Poincaré covariance is broken, whereas Maggiore deals with a case where there is a full representation of the Poincaré symmetry.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ About homogeneity of time, does that mean $H$ indirectly depends on the 4-vector $x$ and then on t, through the field $\phi(x)$, but in the end it's a constant of motion? In other words, does in this case the Hamiltonian can still depend indirectly on time? $\endgroup$
    – Andrea
    Commented Jun 24 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ Asking cause a common example to get Feynman rule in the books is to use the interaction $\phi^4$ so in this case it depends on $\phi(x)$ and then on $t$ indirectly through $x$ $\endgroup$
    – Andrea
    Commented Jun 24 at 13:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ YES: When you integrate $T_{00}$ over the rest space $\Sigma$ in $d^3x$, the $\vec{x}$ dependence disappears and the $t$ dependence disappears as well because the integral is a constant of motion. That is true also for the $\phi^4(x)$ model, of course. $\endgroup$
    – Valter Moretti
    Commented Jun 24 at 15:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.