2
$\begingroup$

The probability that an energy state in the conduction band is occupied by an electron is 0.001. Would this semiconductor then be n-type, p-type, or intrinsic?

Notation that I use: $E_F$ represents the fermi energy level, $E_C$ represents the energy level of the conduction band, and $E_V$ represents the energy level of the valence band. $E_{Fi}$ represents the fermi level of an instrinsic semiconductor.

We know that the $E_F$ is where the majority of the electrons are. Because the probability that an electron is in the conduction band is 0.001, we know that there are very few electrons in the conduction band. In that case, that means that $E_F$ is very far from $E_C$ and is instead close to $E_V$. Because $E_F$ < $E_{Fi}$, the semiconductor is p-type. The semiconductor is actually n-type. What is the flaw in my understanding?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

You can't just say "0.001 is a very small number, therefore there are very few electrons in the conduction band." Is 0.001 really a small number? Well, compared to 1, it's a small number, but compared to 0.0000001, it's an enormous number!!

As it happens, there is an enormous density of conduction band states, so even if only 1/1000th of them is occupied, the semiconductor still has a large number of electrons.

A good starting point is to use the figure of 0.001 to try to figure out mathematically how far the fermi level is below the conduction band. How many eV? Then draw the fermi level at the appropriate place in the bandgap. Look at the picture, then you can answer the question of whether the semiconductor is p-type or n-type.

By the way, I don't want you to think that your original reasoning was stupid. In fact, there's nothing wrong with having a qualitative discussion of a physical system, using terms like "big" or "small". It's an extremely important skill! But you can't have those kinds of discussions until you have some rough ideas about "how big is big" and "how small is small". Working through some examples numerically is a good way to develop that sense. Then later on, you'll be able to answer this question (and similar questions) correctly off the top of your head, without doing any calculations. So use math for now, but keep thinking visually and qualitatively about what you're learning when you do those calculations. :-D

I won't want walk through all the quantitative details here: It's a homework problem which is beneficial to do yourself. :-D

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Since the Fermi dirstribution is obviously either close to 1 or close to zero except at the fermi level, the answer to you question can be easily answered by looking at the figure below.

Would this semiconductor then be n-type, p-type, or intrinsic?

P-TYPE!

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! If you don't mind me asking, what does N(E) represent (second column of graphs)? $\endgroup$ – user1251385 Oct 22 '13 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ Never mind. I got it. $\endgroup$ – user1251385 Oct 22 '13 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ It is the density of states. $\endgroup$ – mcodesmart Oct 22 '13 at 21:48
  • $\begingroup$ I just checked the professor's answer and it is also n-type. I guess both the professor and the textbook are wrong? I must be missing something... $\endgroup$ – user1251385 Oct 22 '13 at 22:17
  • $\begingroup$ I still think it is p-type. The probability is practically zero. $\endgroup$ – mcodesmart Oct 23 '13 at 18:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.