2
$\begingroup$

Tree-level cross sections for processes described by Fermi theory behave like $\sigma $ $\sim$ $G_{F}^2 \cdot s$, where $G_{F}$ is the Fermi constant and $\sqrt s$ is the energy entering in the process.
Then it is clear that for high energies Fermi theory violates unitarity, since as $s$ increases also $\sigma$ does. Starting from here, I was wondering if it was possible to obtain the Fermi EFT cutoff just by imposing unitarity.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Haven't you already done it? $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Commented Jun 6 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @Andrew, I was just missing one step and now maybe I have found the solution. I will write it as a reply to the question. $\endgroup$
    – onibaku
    Commented Jun 7 at 9:20

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Here is what I came up with, I will leave it here since maybe it could be useful to someone.
Following this answer https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/139242/378284 it can be seen that unitarity of the S-matrix imposes the behaviour $\sigma \sim s^{-1}$ to the total cross section of a scattering process.
Hence the unitarity bound applied to the cross section of Fermi theory results in the following inequality
\begin{equation} \sigma_{Fermi} \sim G^2_{F}s \lesssim \frac{1}{s} \end{equation} which gives \begin{equation} \sqrt{s} \lesssim \frac{1}{\sqrt{G_{F}}} \sim 300 GeV \end{equation} (where $G_{F} = 1.1663787 \cdot 10^{-5} GeV^{-2}$). This is indeed what I was expecting as a cutoff to the Fermi theory, since Fermi EFT operators $\frac{G_{F}}{\sqrt{2}}\bar{\psi}\psi\bar{\psi}\psi$ carry a dimensionful coefficient dependent on the Higgs vacum expectation value scale: \begin{equation} \frac{G_{F}}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{1}{2v^2_{ew}}; \ v_{ew} \simeq 250 GeV \sim \sqrt{\frac{1}{G_{F}}} \end{equation} So, even if the infrared description breakes down at energies $E \sim M_{W} \sim 80 GeV$, the coefficients of the irrelevant operators are suppressed by a larger effective scale $v_{ew} \sim 250 GeV$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.