-5
$\begingroup$

The traditional tranformers suffer a lot of losses in various forms, some of them are as follows : 1. Flux leakage 2. Eddy currents 3. Hysteresis

Figure : Figure

But as we are taught induction we come across the attached figure of two inductors placed coaxially various times. My point is that if we would actually place inductors in this way, we would have the following benefits :

Note : taking inner coil as primary

  1. NO NEED OF CORE : As the flux of inner coil passes from outer on its own, no core is needed for transferring flux from primary to secondary
  2. NO FLUX LEAKAGE : As entire flux of inner inductor passes from outer, no flux is leaked.
  3. NO EDDY CURRENTS: As no core is used no eddy currents are generated.
  4. NO HYSTERESIS : Similarly due to absense of core, no loss due to hysteresis is encountered.

So what really is the problem in creating transformers in such a way to reduce losses much more than the current status ?

All relevant opinions and comments appreciated

My original post : http://thinklo.blogspot.in/2013/10/improving-transformers.html

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by akhmeteli, Emilio Pisanty, Waffle's Crazy Peanut, Manishearth Oct 21 '13 at 6:54

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question appears to be about engineering, which is the application of scientific knowledge to construct a solution to solve a specific problem. As such, it is off topic for this site, which deals with the science, whether theoretical or experimental, of how the natural world works. For more information, see this meta post." – akhmeteli, Waffle's Crazy Peanut, Manishearth
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you phyllipe for the edit, I had asked the question from mobile and sadly there is no facility for uploading pictures in the mobile version of the site till now $\endgroup$ – Rijul Gupta Oct 20 '13 at 16:32
1
$\begingroup$

Well a problem with your concept is that an "air core" transformer can produce only a limited magnetic flux density; limited by the amount of current you can run through it.

If your transformer is for power conversion/transmission, your scheme would be extremely inefficient at power line frequencies. It can be shown that the efficiency is maximized when the "copper losses" are equal to the "iron losses" or "core losses if you prefer.

Since, your transformer has no iron core, there are very low to near zero core losses, but the copper losses (wire resistance) is very high.

With an "iron" core, you can get magnetic fields of 10-15,000 Gauss (is that 1-1.5 Tesla), because of the high permeability, so you can use fewer turns of thicker wire, so less resistance, and copper losses, but more core losses, eddy currents, hysteresis losses etc.

The design of efficient and cost effective transformers, is a very complex discipline.

Sometimes it can get slightly insane. Problem with iron cores, is that they saturate somewhere in the 15-20,000 Gauss region, so if you want to go higher in flux density than that, you have to get rid of the iron. Someone did that once on an electromagnet for an accelerator. They used just two turns of wire, each a foot in diameter (the wire, not the coil). They put 800 Volts across those two turns and it drew 6 million Amps; but gave them twice the field they could get with iron. Guys name was Marcus Oliphant, in Australia. They called his machine (which worked) the white Oliphant.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I understand that my air core will not get us sufficient magnetic field as iron core would do. But what if we simply inserted an iron core inside the primary. As a result it would have atleast less flux leakage than a traditional transformer $\endgroup$ – Rijul Gupta Oct 20 '13 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ Well, It would take me a week to explain to you, everything that I know about transformer design; over all frequency ranges; and I am far from being an expert or specialist in the field. You should look up the word pre-requisite, in a dictionary. It is pointless to try and learn about quantum mechanics, If you don't already understand how a simple pendulum works. And your simple "transformer" has oodles more flux leakage than a "traditional transformer". I told you it already is a complex discipline. $\endgroup$ – user26165 Oct 20 '13 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ I bit hurtful here and there but ok I get it. Although I am intrigued to know how this design has more leakage even with the iron core at center than a traditional transformer. $\endgroup$ – Rijul Gupta Oct 20 '13 at 18:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Was not meant to be hurtful; just instructive. Now do you think your long winding with current in it, might generate a magnetic field that looks something like a bar magnet, with poles at the ends ?? Well the magnetic field lines, have to get from one end of the coil, back around (on the outside) to get back to the other end of the coil) the lines have to be closed paths. So there's a lot of field not coupling to the other coil, so you have huge leakage inductance. With a core down the middle, continuing around the outside back to the other end, the field is more confined. $\endgroup$ – user26165 Oct 21 '13 at 0:45

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.